These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23034154)

  • 1. Donor identification 'kills gamete donation'? A response.
    Allan S
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3380-4. PubMed ID: 23034154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proposed legislative change mandating retrospective release of identifying information: consultation with donors and Government response.
    Hammarberg K; Johnson L; Bourne K; Fisher J; Kirkman M
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Feb; 29(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 24319103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How to kill gamete donation: retrospective legislation and donor anonymity.
    Pennings G
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Oct; 27(10):2881-5. PubMed ID: 22786778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psycho-social, ethical and legal arguments for and against the retrospective release of information about donors to donor-conceived individuals in Australia.
    Allan S
    J Law Med; 2011 Dec; 19(2):354-76. PubMed ID: 22320008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attitudes of anonymous and identity-release oocyte donors towards future contact with donor offspring.
    Miettinen A; Rotkirch A; Suikkari AM; Söderström-Anttila V
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Apr; 34(4):672-678. PubMed ID: 30805634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accessing donor conception information in Australia: a call for retrospective access.
    Adams D; Lorbach C
    J Law Med; 2012 Jun; 19(4):707-21. PubMed ID: 22908615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Donor conception legislation in Victoria, Australia: the "Time to Tell" campaign, donor-linking and implications for clinical practice.
    Johnson L; Bourne K; Hammarberg K
    J Law Med; 2012 Jun; 19(4):803-19. PubMed ID: 22908621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time for a national approach to donor conception in Australia.
    Bennett B
    J Law Med; 2011 Sep; 19(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 21988005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "I want us to be a normal family": Toward an understanding of the functions of anonymity among U.S. oocyte donors and recipients.
    de Melo-Martín I; Rubin LR; Cholst IN
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(4):235-251. PubMed ID: 30398412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Donor-conceived individuals and access to information about their genetic origins: the relevance and role of rights.
    Tobin J
    J Law Med; 2012 Jun; 19(4):742-57. PubMed ID: 22908617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Secrecy and anonymity in gametes donation].
    Le Lannou D
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2010 May; 38(5):324-31. PubMed ID: 20430672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gamete donors' expectations and experiences of contact with their donor offspring.
    Kirkman M; Bourne K; Fisher J; Johnson L; Hammarberg K
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Apr; 29(4):731-8. PubMed ID: 24549216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The end of donor anonymity: how genetic testing is likely to drive anonymous gamete donation out of business.
    Harper JC; Kennett D; Reisel D
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Jun; 31(6):1135-40. PubMed ID: 27073260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Keeping mum about dad: "contracts" to protect gamete donor anonymity.
    Rees A
    J Law Med; 2012 Jun; 19(4):758-68. PubMed ID: 22908618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two decades after legislation on identifiable donors in Sweden: are recipient couples ready to be open about using gamete donation?
    Isaksson S; Skoog Svanberg A; Sydsjö G; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Karlström PO; Solensten NG; Lampic C
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Apr; 26(4):853-60. PubMed ID: 21212053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Legal parent versus biological parent: the impact of disclosure.
    Cahn N
    J Law Med; 2012 Jun; 19(4):790-802. PubMed ID: 22908620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mum's the word: donor anonymity in assisted reproduction.
    Johnston J
    Health Law Rev; 2002; 11(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 15739318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Current trends in gamete donation - psychosocial and ethical issues].
    Rumpíková T; Oborná I; Konečná H
    Ceska Gynekol; 2017; 82(4):293-299. PubMed ID: 28925273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Information rights and donor conception: lessons from adoption?
    Chisholm R
    J Law Med; 2012 Jun; 19(4):722-41. PubMed ID: 22908616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relatively speaking: halachic and legal issues of gamete donation.
    Feuer J
    Med Law; 2011 Jun; 30(2):239-66. PubMed ID: 21877469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.