These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23034732)

  • 1. Aspects of forward scattering from the compression paddle in the dosimetry of mammography.
    Toroi P; Könönen N; Timonen M; Kortesniemi M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 May; 154(4):439-45. PubMed ID: 23034732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forward-scattered radiation from the compression paddle should be considered in glandular dose estimations.
    Hemdal B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):196-201. PubMed ID: 21778158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of a compression paddle on energy response, calibration and measurement with mammographic dosimeters using ionization chambers and solid-state detectors.
    Hourdakis CJ; Boziari A; Koumbouli E
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):1047-59. PubMed ID: 19168939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Calibration and features of air-kerma length product meters.
    Merimaa K; Tapiovaara M; Kosunen A; Toroi P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Dec; 152(4):384-92. PubMed ID: 22539532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of the measurement conditions and compression paddle on mammography dosimeter response.
    Costa de Castro M; Toroi P; Kortesniemi M; Lindholm C; Pinto M; Rinaldi L; Tietäväinen A; Tikkanen J; Živanović M
    Phys Med; 2024 Jul; 123():103405. PubMed ID: 38870645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammography dosimetry using an in-house developed polymethyl methacrylate phantom.
    Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS; Chourasiya G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 22232773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determining air kerma from pixel values in digital mammography.
    Toroi P; Nieminen MT; Tenkanen-Rautakoski P; Varjonen M
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(12):3865-79. PubMed ID: 19491454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Calibration of reference KAP-meters at SSDL and cross calibration of clinical KAP-meters.
    Hetland PO; Friberg EG; Ovrebø KM; Bjerke HH
    Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 18759141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Solid-state dosimeters: a new approach for mammography measurements.
    Brateman LF; Heintz PH
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):542-57. PubMed ID: 25652475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered x-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations.
    Künzel R; Herdade SB; Costa PR; Terini RA; Levenhagen RS
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):2077-91. PubMed ID: 16585846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A tandem calibration method for kerma-area product meters.
    Toroi P; Komppa T; Kosunen A
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):4941-58. PubMed ID: 18711243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Air kerma calculation in Monte Carlo simulations for deriving normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Russo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 62(14):N337-N349. PubMed ID: 28452342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implementation of the European protocol for quality control of the technical aspects of mammography screening in Bulgaria.
    Vassileva J; Avramova-Cholakova S; Dimov A; Lichev A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):403-5. PubMed ID: 15933146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimisation of X-ray examinations in Lithuania: start of implementation in mammography.
    Adliene D; Adlys G; Cerapaite R; Jonaitiene E; Cibulskaite I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):399-402. PubMed ID: 15933145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast compression and experienced pain during mammography by use of three different compression paddles.
    Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Evensen KT; Hantho C; Iden KA; Hofvind S
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jun; 115():59-65. PubMed ID: 31084760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of pressure-controlled mammography compression paddles with respect to force-controlled compression paddles in clinical practice.
    Jeukens CRLPN; van Dijk T; Berben C; Wildberger JE; Lobbes MBI
    Eur Radiol; 2019 May; 29(5):2545-2552. PubMed ID: 30617472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Air-Kerma Standard for Mammography X-Ray in Japan: Progress and Prospects].
    Tanaka T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2021; 41(3):87-91. PubMed ID: 34744139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The calibration of dosimetry instruments used in interventional radiology.
    Rannikko S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):151-3. PubMed ID: 11487826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Average glandular dose in routine mammography screening using a Sectra MicroDose Mammography unit.
    Hemdal B; Herrnsdorf L; Andersson I; Bengtsson G; Heddson B; Olsson M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):436-43. PubMed ID: 15933152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast dosimetry using high-resolution voxel phantoms.
    Dance DR; Hunt RA; Bakic PR; Maidment AD; Sandborg M; Ullman G; Alm Carlsson G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):359-63. PubMed ID: 15933137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.