BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23034760)

  • 1. Simulation of carbohydrates, from molecular docking to dynamics in water.
    Sapay N; Nurisso A; Imberty A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 924():469-83. PubMed ID: 23034760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Solvent structure improves docking prediction in lectin-carbohydrate complexes.
    Gauto DF; Petruk AA; Modenutti CP; Blanco JI; Di Lella S; Martí MA
    Glycobiology; 2013 Feb; 23(2):241-58. PubMed ID: 23089616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling protein recognition of carbohydrates.
    Laederach A; Reilly PJ
    Proteins; 2005 Sep; 60(4):591-7. PubMed ID: 16001416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new GROMOS force field for hexopyranose-based carbohydrates.
    Lins RD; Hünenberger PH
    J Comput Chem; 2005 Oct; 26(13):1400-12. PubMed ID: 16035088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modelling of beta-D-glucopyranose ring distortion in different force fields: a metadynamics study.
    Spiwok V; Králová B; Tvaroska I
    Carbohydr Res; 2010 Feb; 345(4):530-7. PubMed ID: 20053394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. BALLDock/SLICK: a new method for protein-carbohydrate docking.
    Kerzmann A; Fuhrmann J; Kohlbacher O; Neumann D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1616-25. PubMed ID: 18646839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extension and validation of the GROMOS 53A6(GLYC) parameter set for glycoproteins.
    Pol-Fachin L; Verli H; Lins RD
    J Comput Chem; 2014 Nov; 35(29):2087-95. PubMed ID: 25196137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of protein force fields for molecular dynamics simulations.
    Guvench O; MacKerell AD
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 443():63-88. PubMed ID: 18446282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Force fields and scoring functions for carbohydrate simulation.
    Xiong X; Chen Z; Cossins BP; Xu Z; Shao Q; Ding K; Zhu W; Shi J
    Carbohydr Res; 2015 Jan; 401():73-81. PubMed ID: 25464084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Molecular simulations of carbohydrates and protein-carbohydrate interactions: motivation, issues and prospects.
    Fadda E; Woods RJ
    Drug Discov Today; 2010 Aug; 15(15-16):596-609. PubMed ID: 20594934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A reoptimized GROMOS force field for hexopyranose-based carbohydrates accounting for the relative free energies of ring conformers, anomers, epimers, hydroxymethyl rotamers, and glycosidic linkage conformers.
    Hansen HS; Hünenberger PH
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Apr; 32(6):998-1032. PubMed ID: 21387332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. S4MPLE--sampler for multiple protein-ligand entities: simultaneous docking of several entities.
    Hoffer L; Horvath D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jan; 53(1):88-102. PubMed ID: 23215156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expanding the frontiers of protein-protein modeling: from docking and scoring to binding affinity predictions and other challenges.
    Pallara C; Jiménez-García B; Pérez-Cano L; Romero-Durana M; Solernou A; Grosdidier S; Pons C; Moal IH; Fernandez-Recio J
    Proteins; 2013 Dec; 81(12):2192-200. PubMed ID: 23934865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CHARMM additive and polarizable force fields for biophysics and computer-aided drug design.
    Vanommeslaeghe K; MacKerell AD
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2015 May; 1850(5):861-871. PubMed ID: 25149274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why structurally different cyclic peptides can be glycomimetics of the HNK-1 carbohydrate antigen.
    Bhunia A; Vivekanandan S; Eckert T; Burg-Roderfeld M; Wechselberger R; Romanuka J; Bächle D; Kornilov AV; von der Lieth CW; Jiménez-Barbero J; Nifantiev NE; Schachner M; Sewald N; Lütteke T; Hans-Joachim G; Siebert HC
    J Am Chem Soc; 2010 Jan; 132(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 19958024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimizing Solute-Solute Interactions in the GLYCAM06 and CHARMM36 Carbohydrate Force Fields Using Osmotic Pressure Measurements.
    Lay WK; Miller MS; Elcock AH
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Apr; 12(4):1401-7. PubMed ID: 26967542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ensemble docking and molecular dynamics identify knoevenagel curcumin derivatives with potent anti-EGFR activity.
    Yadav IS; Nandekar PP; Srivastavaa S; Sangamwar A; Chaudhury A; Agarwal SM
    Gene; 2014 Apr; 539(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 24491504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conformational properties of glucose-based disaccharides investigated using molecular dynamics simulations with local elevation umbrella sampling.
    Perić-Hassler L; Hansen HS; Baron R; Hünenberger PH
    Carbohydr Res; 2010 Aug; 345(12):1781-801. PubMed ID: 20576257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Carbohydrate-protein interactions: molecular modeling insights.
    Pérez S; Tvaroška I
    Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem; 2014; 71():9-136. PubMed ID: 25480504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining coarse-grained nonbonded and atomistic bonded interactions for protein modeling.
    Zacharias M
    Proteins; 2013 Jan; 81(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 22911567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.