These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23034892)

  • 1. Maximum likelihood pedigree reconstruction using integer linear programming.
    Cussens J; Bartlett M; Jones EM; Sheehan NA
    Genet Epidemiol; 2013 Jan; 37(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 23034892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved maximum likelihood reconstruction of complex multi-generational pedigrees.
    Sheehan NA; Bartlett M; Cussens J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2014 Nov; 97():11-9. PubMed ID: 25107832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maximum likelihood haplotyping for general pedigrees.
    Fishelson M; Dovgolevsky N; Geiger D
    Hum Hered; 2005; 59(1):41-60. PubMed ID: 15802921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incorporating genotyping uncertainty in haplotype frequency estimation in pedigree studies.
    Zhu WS; Fung WK; Guo J
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(3):172-81. PubMed ID: 17536211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detecting familial aggregation.
    Naj AC; Park YS; Beaty TH
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 850():119-50. PubMed ID: 22307697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pedigree reconstruction in wild cichlid fish populations.
    Koch M; Hadfield JD; Sefc KM; Sturmbauer C
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Oct; 17(20):4500-11. PubMed ID: 18986496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship uncertainty linkage statistics (RULS): affected relative pair statistics that model relationship uncertainty.
    Ray A; Weeks DE
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 May; 32(4):313-24. PubMed ID: 18205206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Likelihood approach for detecting imprinting and in utero maternal effects using general pedigrees from prospective family-based association studies.
    Yang J; Lin S
    Biometrics; 2012 Jun; 68(2):477-85. PubMed ID: 22008205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficient maximum likelihood pedigree reconstruction.
    Cowell RG
    Theor Popul Biol; 2009 Dec; 76(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 19781561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of DNA-based identification software by computation of pedigree likelihood ratios.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 20727843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving estimates of genetic maps: a maximum likelihood approach.
    Stewart WC; Thompson EA
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):728-34. PubMed ID: 16984314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Composite likelihood method for inferring local pedigrees.
    Ko A; Nielsen R
    PLoS Genet; 2017 Aug; 13(8):e1006963. PubMed ID: 28827797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Score tests for epistasis models on quantitative traits using general pedigree data.
    Wang K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Dec; 25(4):314-26. PubMed ID: 14639701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximum likelihood estimates of allele frequencies and error rates from samples of related individuals by gene counting.
    Thomas A; Camp NJ
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(6):771-2. PubMed ID: 16410318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Choosing relatives for DNA identification of missing persons.
    Ge J; Budowle B; Chakraborty R
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56 Suppl 1():S23-8. PubMed ID: 21155801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bonsai: An efficient method for inferring large human pedigrees from genotype data.
    Jewett EM; McManus KF; Freyman WA; ; Auton A
    Am J Hum Genet; 2021 Nov; 108(11):2052-2070. PubMed ID: 34739834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pedigree disequilibrium tests for multilocus haplotypes.
    Dudbridge F
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Sep; 25(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 12916020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A clustering algorithm using DNA marker information for sub-pedigree reconstruction.
    Cowell RG; Mostad P
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Nov; 48(6):1239-48. PubMed ID: 14640266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploiting gene-environment independence in family-based case-control studies: increased power for detecting associations, interactions and joint effects.
    Chatterjee N; Kalaylioglu Z; Carroll RJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 28(2):138-56. PubMed ID: 15593088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating the power of variance component linkage analysis in large pedigrees.
    Chen WM; Abecasis GR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Sep; 30(6):471-84. PubMed ID: 16685720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.