These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23034892)

  • 21. A comparison of several methods for haplotype frequency estimation and haplotype reconstruction for tightly linked markers from general pedigrees.
    Zhang K; Zhao H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 30(5):423-37. PubMed ID: 16685719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On identification problems requiring linked autosomal markers.
    Egeland T; Sheehan N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 19083824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pedigree reconstruction using identity by descent.
    Kirkpatrick B; Li SC; Karp RM; Halperin E
    J Comput Biol; 2011 Nov; 18(11):1481-93. PubMed ID: 22035331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Genetic aspects of genealogy].
    Tetushkin EIu
    Genetika; 2011 Nov; 47(11):1451-72. PubMed ID: 22332404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Relating two deep-rooted pedigrees from Central Germany by high-resolution Y-STR haplotyping.
    Kayser M; Vermeulen M; Knoblauch H; Schuster H; Krawczak M; Roewer L
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Jun; 1(2):125-8. PubMed ID: 19083742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Selecting loop breakers in general pedigrees.
    Vitezica ZG; Mongeau M; Manfredi E; Elsen JM
    Hum Hered; 2004; 57(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15133307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Genetic association analysis with pedigrees: Direct inference using the composite likelihood ratio.
    Baskurt Z; Strug LJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2018 Dec; 42(8):826-837. PubMed ID: 30221395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Structured incorporation of prior information in relationship identification problems.
    Sheehan NA; Egeland T
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Jul; 71(Pt 4):501-18. PubMed ID: 17233753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. HAPLORE: a program for haplotype reconstruction in general pedigrees without recombination.
    Zhang K; Sun F; Zhao H
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 21(1):90-103. PubMed ID: 15231536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reconstruction of pedigrees in clonal plant populations.
    Riester M; Stadler PF; Klemm K
    Theor Popul Biol; 2010 Sep; 78(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 20566407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Family-based linkage disequilibrium tests using general pedigrees.
    Shugart YY; Chen L; Li R; Beaty T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 376():141-9. PubMed ID: 17984543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. DNA-based paternity analysis and genetic evaluation in a large, commercial cattle ranch setting.
    Van Eenennaam AL; Weaber RL; Drake DJ; Penedo MC; Quaas RL; Garrick DJ; Pollak EJ
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3159-69. PubMed ID: 17878282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. On the use of dense SNP marker data for the identification of distant relative pairs.
    Sun M; Jobling MA; Taliun D; Pramstaller PP; Egeland T; Sheehan NA
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():14-25. PubMed ID: 26474828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A family study in Oman: large, consanguineous, polygamous Omani Arab pedigrees.
    Hassan MO; Albarwani S; Al Yahyaee S; Al Haddabi S; Rizwi S; Jaffer A; Al-Lawati J; Cai G; Comuzzie AG; Bayoumi RA
    Community Genet; 2005; 8(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 15767758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. PADRE: Pedigree-Aware Distant-Relationship Estimation.
    Staples J; Witherspoon DJ; Jorde LB; Nickerson DA; ; Below JE; Huff CD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Jul; 99(1):154-62. PubMed ID: 27374771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Methods for interaction analyses using family-based case-control data: conditional logistic regression versus generalized estimating equations.
    Hancock DB; Martin ER; Li YJ; Scott WK
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 31(8):883-93. PubMed ID: 17565751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A kernel of truth: statistical advances in polygenic variance component models for complex human pedigrees.
    Blangero J; Diego VP; Dyer TD; Almeida M; Peralta J; Kent JW; Williams JT; Almasy L; Göring HH
    Adv Genet; 2013; 81():1-31. PubMed ID: 23419715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Estimation of allele frequencies using pedigree samples].
    Ginzburg EKh; Aksenovich TI
    Genetika; 1996 Jan; 32(1):120-7. PubMed ID: 8647414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Key individuals for discerning pedigrees belonging to the same autosomal kinship class.
    Gonçalves J; Conde-Sousa E; Egeland T; Amorim A; Pinto N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():71-79. PubMed ID: 28380400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A general approach to power calculation for relationship testing.
    Egeland T; Pinto N; Vigeland MD
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():186-90. PubMed ID: 23810238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.