BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23034901)

  • 1. Novel application of T1-weighted BLADE sequences with fat suppression compared to TSE in contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging of the neck: cutting-edge images?
    Finkenzeller T; Zorger N; Kühnel T; Paetzel C; Schuierer G; Stroszczynski C; Fellner C
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Mar; 37(3):660-8. PubMed ID: 23034901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast-enhanced radial 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo sequence versus conventional fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted studies of the head and neck.
    Wu X; Raz E; Block TK; Geppert C; Hagiwara M; Bruno MT; Fatterpekar GM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):883-9. PubMed ID: 25247956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Elimination of motion and pulsation artifacts using BLADE sequences in knee MR imaging.
    Lavdas E; Mavroidis P; Hatzigeorgiou V; Roka V; Arikidis N; Oikonomou G; Andrianopoulos K; Notaras I
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Oct; 30(8):1099-110. PubMed ID: 22673894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted FLAIR with BLADE, and spin-echo T1-weighted sequences in intracranial MRI.
    Alkan O; Kizilkiliç O; Yildirim T; Alibek S
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2009 Jun; 15(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 19517375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. T2-weighted MRI of the upper abdomen: comparison of four fat-suppressed T2-weighted sequences including PROPELLER (BLADE) technique.
    Bayramoglu S; Kilickesmez O; Cimilli T; Kayhan A; Yirik G; Islim F; Alibek S
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):368-74. PubMed ID: 20042352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improvement of image quality using BLADE sequences in brain MR imaging.
    Lavdas E; Mavroidis P; Kostopoulos S; Glotsos D; Roka V; Topalzikis T; Bakas A; Oikonomou G; Papanikolaou N; Batsikas G; Kaffes I; Kechagias D
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Feb; 31(2):189-200. PubMed ID: 22959874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images.
    Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrast-enhanced volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination compared with spin-echo T1-weighted imaging of head and neck tumors.
    Kataoka M; Ueda H; Koyama T; Umeoka S; Togashi K; Asato R; Tanaka S; Ito J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):313-9. PubMed ID: 15615994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image quality of T2w-TSE of the abdomen and pelvis with Cartesian or BLADE-type k-space sampling: a retrospective interindividual comparison study.
    Haneder S; Dinter D; Gutfleisch A; Schoenberg SO; Michaely HJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 20149565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery BLADE magnetic resonance imaging of the brain: an alternative to spin-echo technique for detection of brain lesions in the unsedated pediatric patient?
    Alibek S; Adamietz B; Cavallaro A; Stemmer A; Anders K; Kramer M; Bautz W; Staatz G
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Aug; 15(8):986-95. PubMed ID: 18620119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. BLADE sequences in sagittal T2-weighted MR imaging of the cervical spine and spinal cord--lesion detection and clinical value.
    Finkenzeller T; Menzel C; Fellner FA; Fellner CW; Stroszczynski C; Schuierer G; Fellner C
    Rofo; 2014 Jan; 186(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 23999783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal lesions: comparison of three fat-saturation pulse sequences.
    Pui MH; Goh PS; Choo HF; Fok EC
    Australas Radiol; 1997 May; 41(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 9153802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Brain magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla using BLADE compared with standard rectilinear data sampling.
    Wintersperger BJ; Runge VM; Biswas J; Nelson CB; Stemmer A; Simonetta AB; Reiser MF; Naul LG; Schoenberg SO
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Jul; 41(7):586-92. PubMed ID: 16772852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reducing metallic artifacts in postoperative spinal imaging: usefulness of IDEAL contrast-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging--phantom and clinical studies.
    Cha JG; Jin W; Lee MH; Kim DH; Park JS; Shin WH; Yi BH
    Radiology; 2011 Jun; 259(3):885-93. PubMed ID: 21386053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. T1-weighted fat-suppressed imaging of the pelvis with a dual-echo Dixon technique: initial clinical experience.
    Beddy P; Rangarajan RD; Kataoka M; Moyle P; Graves MJ; Sala E
    Radiology; 2011 Feb; 258(2):583-9. PubMed ID: 21079201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PROPELLER technique to improve image quality of MRI of the shoulder.
    Dietrich TJ; Ulbrich EJ; Zanetti M; Fucentese SF; Pfirrmann CW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Dec; 197(6):W1093-100. PubMed ID: 22109324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conspicuity of tumors of the head and neck on fat-suppressed MR images: T2-weighted fast-spin-echo versus contrast-enhanced T1-weighted conventional spin-echo sequences.
    Dubin MD; Teresi LM; Bradley WG; Jordan JE; Pema PJ; Goergen SK; Tam JK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1213-21. PubMed ID: 7717234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Turbo-spin-echo sequences with selective fat suppression (SPIR) in the MRI of focal liver lesions at 0.5 tesla].
    Kreft B; Layer G; Kuhl C; Sommer T; Gieseke J; Schild H
    Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):411-6. PubMed ID: 8527755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MR imaging of bone marrow lesions: relative conspicuousness on T1-weighted, fat-suppressed T2-weighted, and STIR images.
    Mirowitz SA; Apicella P; Reinus WR; Hammerman AM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jan; 162(1):215-21. PubMed ID: 8273669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MR imaging of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle: comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional sequences.
    Czerny C; Rand T; Gstoettner W; Woelfl G; Imhof H; Trattnig S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):791-6. PubMed ID: 9490977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.