These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23034901)
1. Novel application of T1-weighted BLADE sequences with fat suppression compared to TSE in contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging of the neck: cutting-edge images? Finkenzeller T; Zorger N; Kühnel T; Paetzel C; Schuierer G; Stroszczynski C; Fellner C J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Mar; 37(3):660-8. PubMed ID: 23034901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-enhanced radial 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo sequence versus conventional fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted studies of the head and neck. Wu X; Raz E; Block TK; Geppert C; Hagiwara M; Bruno MT; Fatterpekar GM AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):883-9. PubMed ID: 25247956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Elimination of motion and pulsation artifacts using BLADE sequences in knee MR imaging. Lavdas E; Mavroidis P; Hatzigeorgiou V; Roka V; Arikidis N; Oikonomou G; Andrianopoulos K; Notaras I Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Oct; 30(8):1099-110. PubMed ID: 22673894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted FLAIR with BLADE, and spin-echo T1-weighted sequences in intracranial MRI. Alkan O; Kizilkiliç O; Yildirim T; Alibek S Diagn Interv Radiol; 2009 Jun; 15(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 19517375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. T2-weighted MRI of the upper abdomen: comparison of four fat-suppressed T2-weighted sequences including PROPELLER (BLADE) technique. Bayramoglu S; Kilickesmez O; Cimilli T; Kayhan A; Yirik G; Islim F; Alibek S Acad Radiol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):368-74. PubMed ID: 20042352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improvement of image quality using BLADE sequences in brain MR imaging. Lavdas E; Mavroidis P; Kostopoulos S; Glotsos D; Roka V; Topalzikis T; Bakas A; Oikonomou G; Papanikolaou N; Batsikas G; Kaffes I; Kechagias D Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Feb; 31(2):189-200. PubMed ID: 22959874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images. Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contrast-enhanced volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination compared with spin-echo T1-weighted imaging of head and neck tumors. Kataoka M; Ueda H; Koyama T; Umeoka S; Togashi K; Asato R; Tanaka S; Ito J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):313-9. PubMed ID: 15615994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Image quality of T2w-TSE of the abdomen and pelvis with Cartesian or BLADE-type k-space sampling: a retrospective interindividual comparison study. Haneder S; Dinter D; Gutfleisch A; Schoenberg SO; Michaely HJ Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 20149565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery BLADE magnetic resonance imaging of the brain: an alternative to spin-echo technique for detection of brain lesions in the unsedated pediatric patient? Alibek S; Adamietz B; Cavallaro A; Stemmer A; Anders K; Kramer M; Bautz W; Staatz G Acad Radiol; 2008 Aug; 15(8):986-95. PubMed ID: 18620119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. BLADE sequences in sagittal T2-weighted MR imaging of the cervical spine and spinal cord--lesion detection and clinical value. Finkenzeller T; Menzel C; Fellner FA; Fellner CW; Stroszczynski C; Schuierer G; Fellner C Rofo; 2014 Jan; 186(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 23999783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal lesions: comparison of three fat-saturation pulse sequences. Pui MH; Goh PS; Choo HF; Fok EC Australas Radiol; 1997 May; 41(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 9153802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Brain magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla using BLADE compared with standard rectilinear data sampling. Wintersperger BJ; Runge VM; Biswas J; Nelson CB; Stemmer A; Simonetta AB; Reiser MF; Naul LG; Schoenberg SO Invest Radiol; 2006 Jul; 41(7):586-92. PubMed ID: 16772852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reducing metallic artifacts in postoperative spinal imaging: usefulness of IDEAL contrast-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging--phantom and clinical studies. Cha JG; Jin W; Lee MH; Kim DH; Park JS; Shin WH; Yi BH Radiology; 2011 Jun; 259(3):885-93. PubMed ID: 21386053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. T1-weighted fat-suppressed imaging of the pelvis with a dual-echo Dixon technique: initial clinical experience. Beddy P; Rangarajan RD; Kataoka M; Moyle P; Graves MJ; Sala E Radiology; 2011 Feb; 258(2):583-9. PubMed ID: 21079201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PROPELLER technique to improve image quality of MRI of the shoulder. Dietrich TJ; Ulbrich EJ; Zanetti M; Fucentese SF; Pfirrmann CW AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Dec; 197(6):W1093-100. PubMed ID: 22109324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conspicuity of tumors of the head and neck on fat-suppressed MR images: T2-weighted fast-spin-echo versus contrast-enhanced T1-weighted conventional spin-echo sequences. Dubin MD; Teresi LM; Bradley WG; Jordan JE; Pema PJ; Goergen SK; Tam JK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1213-21. PubMed ID: 7717234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Turbo-spin-echo sequences with selective fat suppression (SPIR) in the MRI of focal liver lesions at 0.5 tesla]. Kreft B; Layer G; Kuhl C; Sommer T; Gieseke J; Schild H Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):411-6. PubMed ID: 8527755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR imaging of bone marrow lesions: relative conspicuousness on T1-weighted, fat-suppressed T2-weighted, and STIR images. Mirowitz SA; Apicella P; Reinus WR; Hammerman AM AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jan; 162(1):215-21. PubMed ID: 8273669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR imaging of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle: comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional sequences. Czerny C; Rand T; Gstoettner W; Woelfl G; Imhof H; Trattnig S AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):791-6. PubMed ID: 9490977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]