These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23034955)

  • 1. MRT letter: Quantum noise removal and classification of breast mammogram images.
    Naseem MT; Sulong GB; Jaffar MA
    Microsc Res Tech; 2012 Dec; 75(12):1609-12. PubMed ID: 23034955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MRT letter: segmentation and texture-based classification of breast mammogram images.
    Naveed N; Jaffar MA; Choi TS
    Microsc Res Tech; 2011 Nov; 74(11):985-7. PubMed ID: 21898670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a novel method of noise reduction using computer-simulated mammograms.
    Tischenko O; Hoeschen C; Dance DR; Hunt RA; Maidment AD; Bakic PR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):81-4. PubMed ID: 15933085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A New Breast Border Extraction and Contrast Enhancement Technique with Digital Mammogram Images for Improved Detection of Breast Cancer.
    Hazarika M; Mahanta LB
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Aug; 19(8):2141-2148. PubMed ID: 30139217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a New Ensemble Learning Framework for Mass Classification in Mammograms.
    Rahmani Seryasat O; Haddadnia J
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Jun; 18(3):e407-e420. PubMed ID: 29141776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantum and impulse noise filtering from breast mammogram images.
    Naveed N; Hussain A; Arfan Jaffar M; Choi TS
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Dec; 108(3):1062-9. PubMed ID: 22940136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammogram enhancement using alpha weighted quadratic filter.
    Zhou Y; Panetta K; Agaian S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3681-4. PubMed ID: 19965002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental investigation on breast tissue classification based on statistical feature extraction of mammograms.
    Sheshadri HS; Kandaswamy A
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007 Jan; 31(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 17070012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
    Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3185-99. PubMed ID: 17505097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recognizing architectural distortion in mammogram: a multiscale texture modeling approach with GMM.
    Biswas SK; Mukherjee DP
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Jul; 58(7):2023-30. PubMed ID: 21421429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast tissue segmentation from x-ray radiographs.
    Chen C; Nielsen M; Karssemeijer N; Brandt SS
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 May; 59(10):2445-56. PubMed ID: 24778348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An automated confirmatory system for analysis of mammograms.
    Peng W; Mayorga RV; Hussein EM
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Mar; 125():134-44. PubMed ID: 26742491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Tri- State Filter for the Removal of Salt and Pepper Noise in Mammogram Images.
    Ramachandran V; Kishorebabu V
    J Med Syst; 2019 Jan; 43(2):40. PubMed ID: 30635739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gray-scale and geometric registration of full-field digital and film-screen mammograms.
    Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
    Med Image Anal; 2007 Apr; 11(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 17208511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel approach for detection and classification of mammographic microcalcifications using wavelet analysis and extreme learning machine.
    Malar E; Kandaswamy A; Chakravarthy D; Giri Dharan A
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Sep; 42(9):898-905. PubMed ID: 22871899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of clustered microcalcifications in small field digital mammography.
    Arodź T; Kurdziel M; Popiela TJ; Sevre EO; Yuen DA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 16310282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantification and normalization of x-ray mammograms.
    Tromans CE; Cocker MR; Brady SM
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Oct; 57(20):6519-40. PubMed ID: 23010610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A mammographic image analysis method to detect and measure changes in breast density.
    Marias K; Behrenbruch C; Highnam R; Parbhoo S; Seifalian A; Brady M
    Eur J Radiol; 2004 Dec; 52(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 15544906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Compression paddle tilt correction in full-field digital mammograms.
    Kallenberg MG; Karssemeijer N
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Feb; 57(3):703-15. PubMed ID: 22241616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.