These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23036443)

  • 1. Bias in clinical epidemiological study designs.
    Rivas-Ruiz F; Pérez-Vicente S; González-Ramírez AR
    Allergol Immunopathol (Madr); 2013; 41(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 23036443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selection bias and information bias in clinical research.
    Tripepi G; Jager KJ; Dekker FW; Zoccali C
    Nephron Clin Pract; 2010; 115(2):c94-9. PubMed ID: 20407272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bias.
    Delgado-Rodríguez M; Llorca J
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2004 Aug; 58(8):635-41. PubMed ID: 15252064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bias and causal associations in observational research.
    Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Lancet; 2002 Jan; 359(9302):248-52. PubMed ID: 11812579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative assessment of unobserved confounding is mandatory in nonrandomized intervention studies.
    Groenwold RH; Hak E; Hoes AW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 18619797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Causation, bias and confounding: a hitchhiker's guide to the epidemiological galaxy Part 2. Principles of causality in epidemiological research: confounding, effect modification and strength of association.
    Shapiro S
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2008 Jul; 34(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 18577320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bias: a review of current understanding.
    Adebiyi AO
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2010 Sep; 39(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 21416795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Epidemiologic studies: pitfalls in interpretation.
    Westhoff CL
    Dialogues Contracept; 1995; 4(5):5-6, 8. PubMed ID: 12288680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reasons for caution when evaluating health care interventions using non-randomised study designs.
    Reeves BC
    Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd; 2004 Aug; 11 Suppl 1():40-5. PubMed ID: 15353902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Classification bias in epidemiological studies].
    Zieliński A
    Przegl Epidemiol; 2008; 62(2):461-70. PubMed ID: 18807495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical inference: critically weighing the evidence from trials and registries to make clinical decisions.
    Morrison D
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Sep; 72(3):381-385. PubMed ID: 18727119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-analysis under the spotlight: focused on a meta-analysis of ventilator weaning.
    Tobin MJ; Jubran A
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Jan; 36(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 18007269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias in research.
    Agabegi SS; Stern PJ
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2008 May; 37(5):242-8. PubMed ID: 18587501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Interpretation of epidemiologic studies. Type of study, elements of bias, causality].
    Touzet S; Colin C
    Rev Prat; 1999 Oct; 49(16):1797-804. PubMed ID: 10578612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical methods for epidemiologic studies of the health effects of air pollution.
    Navidi W; Thomas D; Langholz B; Stram D
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 1999 May; (86):1-50; discussion 51-6. PubMed ID: 10465799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation studies in epidemiology: the relative precision of different designs.
    Wong M; Day NE
    J Epidemiol Biostat; 2000; 5(6):331-7. PubMed ID: 11234737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bias in occupational epidemiology studies.
    Pearce N; Checkoway H; Kriebel D
    Occup Environ Med; 2007 Aug; 64(8):562-8. PubMed ID: 17053019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Commentary: dealing with measurement error: multiple imputation or regression calibration?
    White IR
    Int J Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 35(4):1081-2. PubMed ID: 16847023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bias in clinical research.
    Tripepi G; Jager KJ; Dekker FW; Wanner C; Zoccali C
    Kidney Int; 2008 Jan; 73(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 17978812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bias in surgical research.
    Paradis C
    Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 18650626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.