These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23036919)
1. Government abandons plans to use payments to prevent private providers selecting simplest cases. Hawkes N BMJ; 2012 Oct; 345():e6728. PubMed ID: 23036919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Regulation of health care markets. Goddard M J Health Serv Res Policy; 2003 Oct; 8(4):193-5. PubMed ID: 14596751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The development of the Hill-Burton legislation: interests, issues and compromises. Perlstadt H J Health Soc Policy; 1995; 6(3):77-96. PubMed ID: 10143320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shattuck lecture--the politics of medicine in Britain and the United States. Lister J N Engl J Med; 1986 Jul; 315(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 3088449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medicare Advantage reforms: comparing House and Senate bills. Biles B; Arnold G Issue Brief (Commonw Fund); 2009 Dec; 74():1-12. PubMed ID: 20183948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The grumbling commences. Senate Finance bill greeted by critics from all sides. DoBias M Mod Healthc; 2009 Sep; 39(38):8-9. PubMed ID: 19810227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Renaissance of the fee-based physician?]. Gersch S Urologe A; 2015 Aug; 54(8):1086-8. PubMed ID: 26173494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Federal employees health benefits program: limitation on physician charges and FEHB Program payments--Office of Personnel Management. Final rule. Fed Regist; 1996 Sep; 61(189):50689. PubMed ID: 10161557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An eye on profit. Gornall J BMJ; 2009 Oct; 339():b4294. PubMed ID: 19861371 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Eliminating patient dumping: a proposal for model legislation. Dobbertin JL Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1994 Apr; (182):9-53. PubMed ID: 10133673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In defence of our imperfect PFI. Britnell M Health Serv J; 2012 Jul; 122(6313):16-7. PubMed ID: 23074773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Haven't we been here before? In defence of the NHS. Health Care Anal; 1996 Nov; 4(4):309-16. PubMed ID: 10164001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The British National Health Service under the Conservatives. Iglehart JK N Engl J Med; 1983 Nov; 309(20):1264-8. PubMed ID: 6633584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fixing unfair advantages? Providers hope to see more transparency, networks with Medicare private fee-for-service plans in wake of veto override. Lubell J Mod Healthc; 2008 Jul; 38(29):6-7, 12-3, 1. PubMed ID: 18825797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lobbyists' document shows close working between private sector and government over health bill. Iacobucci G BMJ; 2012 Nov; 345():e8111. PubMed ID: 23187795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Monitor is keeping us in the dark. Dixon A Health Serv J; 2013 Apr; 123(6348):20. PubMed ID: 24044321 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Private health care in Australia: why the government should intervene. Sullivan F Aust Health Rev; 2001; 24(2):1-3. PubMed ID: 11496452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Price setting for doctors. Burström K; Gisin R Dev Health Econ Public Policy; 1998; 7():91-109. PubMed ID: 10538836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]