These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23037820)
1. Biomechanical comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by finite element analysis. Xu H; Tang H; Guan X; Jiang F; Xu N; Ju W; Zhu X; Zhang X; Zhang Q; Li M Neurosurgery; 2013 Mar; 72(1 Suppl Operative):21-6. PubMed ID: 23037820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with 1 or 2 cages by finite-element analysis. Xu H; Ju W; Xu N; Zhang X; Zhu X; Zhu L; Qian X; Wen F; Wu W; Jiang F Neurosurgery; 2013 Dec; 73(2 Suppl Operative):ons198-205; discussion ons205. PubMed ID: 23632763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments. Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Would an anatomically shaped lumbar interbody cage provide better stability? An in vitro cadaveric biomechanical evaluation. Tsitsopoulos PP; Serhan H; Voronov LI; Carandang G; Havey RM; Ghanayem AJ; Patwardhan AG J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Dec; 25(8):E240-4. PubMed ID: 22362111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion with one or two cages by finite element analysis. Chiang MF; Zhong ZC; Chen CS; Cheng CK; Shih SL Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19):E682-9. PubMed ID: 16946641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study. Ambati DV; Wright EK; Lehman RA; Kang DG; Wagner SC; Dmitriev AE Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1812-22. PubMed ID: 24983669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model. Mantell M; Cyriac M; Haines CM; Gudipally M; O'Brien JR J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 26384133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro study of biomechanical behavior of anterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody instrumentation techniques. Niemeyer TK; Koriller M; Claes L; Kettler A; Werner K; Wilke HJ Neurosurgery; 2006 Dec; 59(6):1271-6; discussion 1276-7. PubMed ID: 17277690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using finite element analysis. Influence on adjacent segmental degeneration. Tang S Saudi Med J; 2015 Aug; 36(8):993-6. PubMed ID: 26219453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of the effects of anterior, posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion on vibration characteristics of the human lumbar spine. Fan W; Guo LX Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 Apr; 22(5):490-498. PubMed ID: 30714396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Finite Element Analysis of the Vibration Characteristics of Fused Lumbar Spine. Fan W; Guo LX; Zhao D World Neurosurg; 2021 Jun; 150():e81-e88. PubMed ID: 33647495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Biomechanical stability of unilateral pedicle screw fixation on cadaveric model simulated two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion]. Dong JW; Feng F; Zhao WD; Rong LM; Liu XM Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 May; 49(5):436-9. PubMed ID: 21733402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical Evaluation of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Coflex-F and Pedicle Screw Fixation: Finite Element Analysis of Static and Vibration Conditions. Zhu J; Shen H; Cui Y; Fogel GR; Liao Z; Liu W Orthop Surg; 2022 Sep; 14(9):2339-2349. PubMed ID: 35946442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical analysis of a novel posterior construct in a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion model an in vitro study. Sethi A; Muzumdar AM; Ingalhalikar A; Vaidya R Spine J; 2011 Sep; 11(9):863-9. PubMed ID: 21802998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the Susceptibility to Implant Failure in the Lateral, Posterior, and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis. Oikawa R; Murakami H; Endo H; Yan H; Yamabe D; Chiba Y; Oikawa R; Nishida N; Chen X; Sakai T; Doita M World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e835-e843. PubMed ID: 35605942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of the influence of three different lumbar interbody fusion approaches on stress in the pedicle screw fixation system: Finite element static and vibration analyses. Fan W; Guo LX Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2019 Mar; 35(3):e3162. PubMed ID: 30294902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Primary stiffness of a modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with integrated screw fixation: cadaveric biomechanical study. Keiler A; Schmoelz W; Erhart S; Gnanalingham K Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Aug; 39(17):E994-E1000. PubMed ID: 24875958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do expandable cage size and number of cages matter in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S1? A comparative biomechanical analysis using finite element modeling. Bakhaidar M; Harinathan B; Banurekha Devaraj K; Yoganandan N; Shabani S J Neurosurg Spine; 2024 Aug; 41(2):209-215. PubMed ID: 38788233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]