BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23038083)

  • 1. German Oldenburg Sentence Test for Children: a useful speech audiometry tool for hearing-impaired children at kindergarten and school age.
    Weißgerber T; Baumann U; Brand T; Neumann K
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2012; 64(5):227-33. PubMed ID: 23038083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech audiometry in quiet with the Oldenburg Sentence Test for Children.
    Neumann K; Baumeister N; Baumann U; Sick U; Euler HA; Weissgerber T
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Mar; 51(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 22208668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of speech audiometry by bone conduction in hearing-impaired adults.
    Karlsen EA; Goetzinger CP
    J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 7345063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Göttingen sentence in noise for different audiogram classes].
    Thiele C; Sukowksi H; Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Dec; 91(12):782-8. PubMed ID: 22234848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of the residual hearing on the profound hearing-impaired children with the hearing aids and cochlear implants].
    Luo R; Wang X; Sun C; Lan J
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Dec; 24(24):1123-5. PubMed ID: 21395181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Development of a new test for speech audiometry in children and results in CI children].
    Völter C; Shehata-Dieler W; Baumann R; Helms J
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Oct; 84(10):738-43. PubMed ID: 16231241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs): an audiometric evaluation.
    Priwin C; Stenfelt S; Granström G; Tjellström A; Håkansson B
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 14709999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigation of a matrix sentence test in noise: reproducibility and discrimination function in cochlear implant patients.
    Hey M; Hocke T; Hedderich J; Müller-Deile J
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Dec; 53(12):895-902. PubMed ID: 25140602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Boeheim K; Pok SM; Schloegel M; Filzmoser P
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Vibrant Sound Bridge System. A new kind hearing prosthesis for patients with sensorineural hearing loss. 2. Audiological results].
    Lenarz T; Weber BP; Issing PR; Gnadeberg D; Ambjørnsen K; Mack KF; Winter M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Jul; 80(7):370-80. PubMed ID: 11488147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Norwegian Hearing in Noise Test for Children.
    Myhrum M; Tvete OE; Heldahl MG; Moen I; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 26462169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Cochlear implant in patients with residual hearing].
    Ruh S; Battmer RD; Strauss-Schier A; Lenarz T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Jun; 76(6):347-50. PubMed ID: 9333278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Indication for and verification of hearing aid benefit using modern methods of speech audiometry in German].
    Kollmeier B; Lenarz T; Winkler A; Zokoll MA; Sukowski H; Brand T; Wagener KC
    HNO; 2011 Oct; 59(10):1012-21. PubMed ID: 21769581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Suitability of speech audiometry study procedures for current demands in clinical and general practice].
    von Wedel H
    HNO; 1986 Feb; 34(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 3957726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech and language development in a population of Swedish hearing-impaired pre-school children, a cross-sectional study.
    Borg E; Edquist G; Reinholdson AC; Risberg A; McAllister B
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jul; 71(7):1061-77. PubMed ID: 17512613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of real-world preferences and performance of hearing aids fitted according to the NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 procedures in children with moderately severe to profound hearing loss.
    Quar TK; Ching TY; Newall P; Sharma M
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):322-32. PubMed ID: 23570290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.