241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23038445)
1. Misconduct is the main cause of life-sciences retractions.
Corbyn Z
Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7418):21. PubMed ID: 23038445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications.
Fang FC; Steen RG; Casadevall A
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Oct; 109(42):17028-33. PubMed ID: 23027971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Self-plagiarism case prompts calls for agencies to tighten rules.
Reich ES
Nature; 2010 Dec; 468(7325):745. PubMed ID: 21150967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Science publishing: The trouble with retractions.
Van Noorden R
Nature; 2011 Oct; 478(7367):26-8. PubMed ID: 21979026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
Steen RG
J Med Ethics; 2011 Apr; 37(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21186208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Editorial - Lies have short legs.
Gasbarrini A; Greco AV
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2020 Jul; 24(14):7908. PubMed ID: 32744720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Researchers have finally created a tool to spot duplicated images across thousands of papers.
Butler D
Nature; 2018 Mar; 555(7694):18. PubMed ID: 29493609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings.
Resnik DB; Dinse GE
J Med Ethics; 2013 Jan; 39(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 22942373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fraud, not error, is why two thirds of biomedical papers are withdrawn.
Roehr B
BMJ; 2012 Oct; 345():e6658. PubMed ID: 23033379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeating probability of authors with retracted scientific publications.
Kuroki T; Ukawa A
Account Res; 2018; 25(4):212-219. PubMed ID: 29519161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A painful remedy.
Nature; 2010 Nov; 468(7320):6. PubMed ID: 21048718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Mistakes and misconduct in the research literature: retractions just the tip of the iceberg.
Poulton A
Med J Aust; 2007 Mar; 186(6):323-4. PubMed ID: 17371220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Retracted publications in the drug literature.
Samp JC; Schumock GT; Pickard AS
Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Jul; 32(7):586-95. PubMed ID: 22581659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Research: Uncovering misconduct.
Gewin V
Nature; 2012 May; 485(7396):137-9. PubMed ID: 22563582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Iranian ministers in plagiarism row.
Butler D
Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7264):578-9. PubMed ID: 19794465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail.
Couzin J; Unger K
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Plagiarize or perish?
Ready T
Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):494. PubMed ID: 16675986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes?
Nath SB; Marcus SC; Druss BG
Med J Aust; 2006 Aug; 185(3):152-4. PubMed ID: 16893357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The 'self-plagiarism' oxymoron: can one steal from oneself?
Chrousos GP; Kalantaridou SN; Margioris AN; Gravanis A
Eur J Clin Invest; 2012 Mar; 42(3):231-2. PubMed ID: 22268677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Retractions in general and internal medicine in a high-profile scientific indexing database.
de Almeida RM; Catelani F; Fontes-Pereira AJ; Gave Nde S
Sao Paulo Med J; 2016; 134(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 26313116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
