328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23039370)
1. Functional outcomes of Vibrant Soundbridge applied on the middle ear windows in comparison with conventional hearing aids.
Gunduz B; Atas A; Bayazıt YA; Goksu N; Gokdogan C; Tutar H
Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Dec; 132(12):1306-10. PubMed ID: 23039370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study of hearing aids and round window application of the vibrant sound bridge (VSB) for patients with mixed or conductive hearing loss.
Marino R; Linton N; Eikelboom RH; Statham E; Rajan GP
Int J Audiol; 2013 Apr; 52(4):209-18. PubMed ID: 23527900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vibrant SoundBridge application to middle ear windows versus conventional hearing aids: a comparative study based on international outcome inventory for hearing aids.
Atas A; Tutar H; Gunduz B; Bayazıt YA
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Jan; 271(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 23400404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vibrant Soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery.
Streitberger C; Perotti M; Beltrame MA; Giarbini N
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009; 130(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 19813469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The active middle ear implant for the rehabilitation of sensorineural, mixed and conductive hearing losses].
Sprinzl GM; Wolf-Magele A; Schnabl J; Koci V
Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Sep; 90(9):560-72. PubMed ID: 21913153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of active middle ear implants in patients with severe mixed hearing loss.
Verhaegen VJ; Mulder JJ; Cremers CW; Snik AF
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 22366752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Functional results of Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implants in conductive and mixed hearing losses.
Bernardeschi D; Hoffman C; Benchaa T; Labassi S; Beliaeff M; Sterkers O; Grayeli AB
Audiol Neurootol; 2011; 16(6):381-7. PubMed ID: 21228566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oval window membrane vibroplasty for direct acoustic cochlear stimulation: treating severe mixed hearing loss in challenging middle ears.
Schwab B; Salcher RB; Maier H; Kontorinis G
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jul; 33(5):804-9. PubMed ID: 22699990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Vibrant soundbridge implantation of congenital atresia of oval window(with summary of nine cases].
Wang DN; Zhao SQ; Li Y; Ma XB; Ren R; Chen XQ; Li YL
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 31(8):588-589. PubMed ID: 29871320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Vibroplasty in mixed and conductive hearing loss: comparison of different coupling methods.
Vyskocil E; Riss D; Honeder C; Arnoldner C; Hamzavi JS; Baumgartner WD; Flak S; Gstoettner W
Laryngoscope; 2014 Jun; 124(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 24338550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Our auditory results using the Vibrant Soundbridge on the long process of the incus: 20 years of data.
Grégoire A; Van Damme JP; Gilain C; Bihin B; Garin P
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Feb; 45(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 28285827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrospective audiological analysis of bone conduction versus round window vibratory stimulation in patients with mixed hearing loss.
Mojallal H; Schwab B; Hinze AL; Giere T; Lenarz T
Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 25735204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Active middle ear implants in patients undergoing subtotal petrosectomy: new application for the Vibrant Soundbridge device and its implication for lateral cranium base surgery.
Linder T; Schlegel C; DeMin N; van der Westhuizen S
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 18849883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benefits of active middle ear implants in mixed hearing loss: Stapes versus round window.
Lee JM; Jung J; Moon IS; Kim SH; Choi JY
Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 27560038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Vibrant Sound Bridge System. A new kind hearing prosthesis for patients with sensorineural hearing loss. 2. Audiological results].
Lenarz T; Weber BP; Issing PR; Gnadeberg D; Ambjørnsen K; Mack KF; Winter M
Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Jul; 80(7):370-80. PubMed ID: 11488147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exclusive transcanal surgical approach for Vibrant Soundbridge implantation: surgical and functional results.
Bruschini L; Forli F; Giannarelli M; Bruschini P; Berrettini S
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):950-5. PubMed ID: 19730149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment of the atretic ear with round window vibrant soundbridge implantation in infants and children: electrocochleography and audiologic outcomes.
Mandalà M; Colletti L; Colletti V
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Oct; 32(8):1250-5. PubMed ID: 21897320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Alternative Coupling Methods of the Vibrant Soundbridge Floating Mass Transducer.
Busch S; Lenarz T; Maier H
Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(6):347-355. PubMed ID: 28068651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Middle ear implant in conductive and mixed congenital hearing loss in children.
Roman S; Denoyelle F; Farinetti A; Garabedian EN; Triglia JM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Dec; 76(12):1775-8. PubMed ID: 22985678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term outcome of round window Vibrant SoundBridge implantation in extensive ossicular chain defects.
Colletti L; Mandalà M; Colletti V
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Jul; 149(1):134-41. PubMed ID: 23585147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
