BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23039455)

  • 1. Variability in the relationships among voice quality, harmonic amplitudes, open quotient, and glottal area waveform shape in sustained phonation.
    Kreiman J; Shue YL; Chen G; Iseli M; Gerratt BR; Neubauer J; Alwan A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2625-32. PubMed ID: 23039455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a glottal area index that integrates glottal gap size and open quotient.
    Chen G; Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Neubauer J; Shue YL; Alwan A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1656-66. PubMed ID: 23464035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 3D Reconstruction of Phonatory Glottal Shape and Volume: Effects of Neuromuscular Activation.
    Reddy NK; Schlegel P; Lee Y; Chhetri DK
    Laryngoscope; 2023 Feb; 133(2):357-365. PubMed ID: 35633189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship of Various Open Quotients With Acoustic Property, Phonation Types, Fundamental Frequency, and Intensity.
    Yokonishi H; Imagawa H; Sakakibara K; Yamauchi A; Nito T; Yamasoba T; Tayama N
    J Voice; 2016 Mar; 30(2):145-57. PubMed ID: 25953586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The difference between first and second harmonic amplitudes correlates between glottal airflow and neck-surface accelerometer signals during phonation.
    Mehta DD; Espinoza VM; Van Stan JH; Zañartu M; Hillman RE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 May; 145(5):EL386. PubMed ID: 31153299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Supraglottic Activity and Spectral Slope Between Theater Actors and Vocally Untrained Subjects.
    Guzman M; Ortega A; Olavarria C; Muñoz D; Cortés P; Azocar MJ; Cayuleo D; Quintana F; Silva C
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):767.e1-767.e8. PubMed ID: 26725552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity of odd-harmonic amplitudes to open quotient and skewing quotient in glottal airflow.
    Titze IR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):502-4. PubMed ID: 25618080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of initiating oral contraceptive use on voice: a case study.
    Morris RJ; Gorham-Rowan MM; Harmon AB
    J Voice; 2011 Mar; 25(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 20137894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of resonance tubes on glottal contact quotient with and without task instruction: a comparison of trained and untrained voices.
    Gaskill CS; Quinney DM
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):e79-93. PubMed ID: 21550779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flow Glottogram Characteristics and Perceived Degree of Phonatory Pressedness.
    Millgård M; Fors T; Sundberg J
    J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 26001499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences Among Mixed, Chest, and Falsetto Registers: A Multiparametric Study.
    Lee Y; Oya M; Kaburagi T; Hidaka S; Nakagawa T
    J Voice; 2023 Mar; 37(2):298.e11-298.e29. PubMed ID: 33518476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On H1-H2 as an acoustic measure of linguistic phonation type.
    Chai Y; Garellek M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Sep; 152(3):1856. PubMed ID: 36182308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Whisper and Phonation: Aerodynamic Comparisons Across Adduction and Loudness.
    Konnai R; Scherer RC; Peplinski A; Ryan K
    J Voice; 2017 Nov; 31(6):773.e11-773.e20. PubMed ID: 28366247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative assessment of videolaryngostroboscopic images in patients with glottic pathologies.
    Niebudek-Bogusz E; Kopczynski B; Strumillo P; Morawska J; Wiktorowicz J; Sliwinska-Kowalska M
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2017 Jul; 42(2):73-83. PubMed ID: 27132636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of glottal cycle characteristics between children and adults: physiological variations.
    Patel RR; Dubrovskiy D; Döllinger M
    J Voice; 2014 Jul; 28(4):476-86. PubMed ID: 24629646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Glottal open quotient in singing: measurements and correlation with laryngeal mechanisms, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency.
    Henrich N; D'Alessandro C; Doval B; Castellengo M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1417-30. PubMed ID: 15807029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency, intensity, and target matching effects on photoglottographic measures of open quotient and speed quotient.
    Hanson DG; Gerratt BR; Berke GS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 2314084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Glottal characteristics of female speakers: acoustic correlates.
    Hanson HM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jan; 101(1):466-81. PubMed ID: 9000737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Objective measurement of mucosal wave parameters in diagnosing benign lesions of the vocal folds.
    Krasnodębska P; Szkiełkowska A; Miaśkiewicz B; Włodarczyk E; Domeracka-Kołodziej A; Skarżyński H
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2019 Jul; 44(2):73-78. PubMed ID: 29318925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objective analysis of vocal warm-up with special reference to ergonomic factors.
    Vintturi J; Alku P; Lauri ER; Sala E; Sihvo M; Vilkman I
    J Voice; 2001 Mar; 15(1):36-53. PubMed ID: 12269633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.