322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23039565)
1. The effect of noise envelope modulation on quality judgments of noisy speech.
Jin IK; Kates JM; Arehart KH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):EL277-83. PubMed ID: 23039565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
Jørgensen S; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses.
Koning R; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2569-81. PubMed ID: 23039450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acceptable range of speech level in noisy sound fields for young adults and elderly persons.
Sato H; Morimoto M; Ota R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1411-9. PubMed ID: 21895082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Kates JM
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.
Chen F; Wong LL; Tahmina Q; Azimi B; Hu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL142-8. PubMed ID: 22894313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.
Francart T; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21091261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sentence perception in listening conditions having similar speech intelligibility indices.
Gustafson SJ; Pittman AL
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 21047291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection threshold for sound distortion resulting from noise reduction in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1375. PubMed ID: 25190410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between speech recognition in noise and sparseness.
Li G; Lutman ME; Wang S; Bleeck S
Int J Audiol; 2012 Feb; 51(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 22107445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intelligibility of reverberant noisy speech with ideal binary masking.
Roman N; Woodruff J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2153-61. PubMed ID: 21973369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech intelligibility among modulated and spatially distributed noise sources.
Culling JF; Mansell ER
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2254-61. PubMed ID: 23556593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of speech transmission in open public spaces affected by combined noises.
Lee PJ; Jeon JY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 21786892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The relative importance of spectral cues for vowel recognition in severe noise.
Swanepoel R; Oosthuizen DJ; Hanekom JJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2652-62. PubMed ID: 23039458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and evaluation of the Mandarin speech signal content on the acceptable noise level test in listeners with normal hearing in mainland China.
Chen J; Zhang H; Plyler PN; Cao W; Chen J
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):354-60. PubMed ID: 21599613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefit of temporal fine structure to speech perception in noise measured with controlled temporal envelopes.
Eaves JM; Summerfield AQ; Kitterick PT
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):501-7. PubMed ID: 21786915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microscopic prediction of speech intelligibility in spatially distributed speech-shaped noise for normal-hearing listeners.
Geravanchizadeh M; Fallah A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):4004-15. PubMed ID: 26723354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
