170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23039627)
1. Is RapidArc more susceptible to delivery uncertainties than dynamic IMRT?
Betzel GT; Yi BY; Niu Y; Yu CX
Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5882-90. PubMed ID: 23039627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rotational IMRT techniques compared to fixed gantry IMRT and tomotherapy: multi-institutional planning study for head-and-neck cases.
Wiezorek T; Brachwitz T; Georg D; Blank E; Fotina I; Habl G; Kretschmer M; Lutters G; Salz H; Schubert K; Wagner D; Wendt TG
Radiat Oncol; 2011 Feb; 6():20. PubMed ID: 21338501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. RapidArc patient specific mechanical delivery accuracy under extreme mechanical limits using linac log files.
Wijesooriya K; Aliotta E; Benedict S; Read P; Rich T; Larner J
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1846-53. PubMed ID: 22482606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of MLC leaf positioning accuracy for static and dynamic IMRT treatments using DAVID in vivo dosimetric system.
Karagoz G; Zorlu F; Yeginer M; Yildiz D; Ozyigit G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):14-23. PubMed ID: 27074451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Poster - Thur Eve - 40: Dynamic arc sliding window tests for checking MLC gap consistency in rapid arc delivery.
Mei X; Konieczny J; Leszczynsky K
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7Part3):4632. PubMed ID: 28516723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. IMRT and RapidArc commissioning of a TrueBeam linear accelerator using TG-119 protocol cases.
Wen N; Zhao B; Kim J; Chin-Snyder K; Bellon M; Glide-Hurst C; Barton K; Chen D; Chetty IJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 15(5):4843. PubMed ID: 25207569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding the impact of RapidArc therapy delivery errors for prostate cancer.
Oliver M; Bush K; Zavgorodni S; Ansbacher W; Beckham WA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2011 May; 12(3):3409. PubMed ID: 21844850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tolerances on MLC leaf position accuracy for IMRT delivery with a dynamic MLC.
Rangel A; Dunscombe P
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3304-9. PubMed ID: 19673226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of direct clinical consequences of MLC positional errors in volumetric-modulated arc therapy using 3D dosimetry system.
Nithiyanantham K; Mani GK; Subramani V; Mueller L; Palaniappan KK; Kataria T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):296–305. PubMed ID: 26699311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A planning comparison of dynamic IMRT for different collimator leaf thicknesses with helical tomotherapy and RapidArc for prostate and head and neck tumors.
Jacob V; Bayer W; Astner ST; Busch R; Kneschaurek P
Strahlenther Onkol; 2010 Sep; 186(9):502-10. PubMed ID: 20803184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The inter- and intrafraction reproducibilities of three common IMRT delivery techniques.
Buckey CR; Stathakis S; Papanikolaou N
Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 37(9):4854-60. PubMed ID: 20964202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A dosimetric comparison of RapidArc and IMRT with hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost to the prostate for treatment of prostate cancer.
Ishii K; Ogino R; Okada W; Nakahara R; Kawamorita R; Nakajima T
Br J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 86(1030):20130199. PubMed ID: 23995872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric effects of multileaf collimator leaf width on intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.
Hong CS; Ju SG; Kim M; Kim JI; Kim JM; Suh TS; Han Y; Ahn YC; Choi DH; Nam H; Park HC
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021712. PubMed ID: 24506603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic and prostate cancer using pulsed low-dose rate delivery techniques.
Li J; Lang J; Wang P; Kang S; Lin MH; Chen X; Chen F; Guo M; Chen L; Ma CM
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 25087084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric comparison of RapidArc with fixed gantry intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment for multiple liver metastases radiotherapy.
Yin Y; Ma C; Gao M; Chen J; Ma Y; Liu T; Lu J; Yu J
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(4):448-54. PubMed ID: 21474299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Total dural irradiation: RapidArc versus static-field IMRT: a case study.
Kelly PJ; Mannarino E; Lewis JH; Baldini EH; Hacker FL
Med Dosim; 2012; 37(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 21862313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy.
Yu CX; Li XA; Ma L; Chen D; Naqvi S; Shepard D; Sarfaraz M; Holmes TW; Suntharalingam M; Mansfield CM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):453-63. PubMed ID: 12023150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity of volumetric modulated arc therapy patient specific QA results to multileaf collimator errors and correlation to dose volume histogram based metrics.
Coleman L; Skourou C
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111715. PubMed ID: 24320423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
