These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23039654)
1. Estimation of the two-dimensional presampled modulation transfer function of digital radiography devices using one-dimensional test objects. Wells JR; Dobbins JT Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):6148-60. PubMed ID: 23039654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response. Kuhls-Gilcrist A; Jain A; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR; Rudin S Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):724-35. PubMed ID: 20229882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function. Samei E; Ranger NT; Dobbins JT; Chen Y Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1454-65. PubMed ID: 16752580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device. Samei E; Flynn MJ; Reimann DA Med Phys; 1998 Jan; 25(1):102-13. PubMed ID: 9472832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurement of the presampled two-dimensional modulation transfer function of digital imaging systems. Fetterly KA; Hangiandreou NJ; Schueler BA; Ritenour ER Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):913-21. PubMed ID: 12033588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control. Carton AK; Vandenbroucke D; Struye L; Maidment AD; Kao YH; Albert M; Bosmans H; Marchal G Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity of the line-pair bar-pattern method in the measurement of the modulation transfer function (MTF) in megavoltage imaging. Gopal A; Samant SS Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):270-9. PubMed ID: 18293582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of a simple method for deriving the presampled modulation transfer function of a digital radiographic system from an edge image. Buhr E; Günther-Kohfahl S; Neitzel U Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2323-31. PubMed ID: 14528954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Influence of angle-measurement error on pre-sampled MTF and proposal of an optimal technique of angle measurement]. Higashide R; Ichikawa K; Kunitomo H; Ohashi K; Kawano M Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2009 Feb; 65(2):245-53. PubMed ID: 19246860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Proposal and verification of presampled MTF measurement by simple analysis using the edge method]. Higashide R; Ichikawa K; Kunitomo H; Sawada M Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2008 Apr; 64(4):417-25. PubMed ID: 18451598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving the accuracy of MTF measurement at low frequencies based on oversampled edge spread function deconvolution. Zhou Z; Gao F; Zhao H; Zhang L; Ren L; Li Z; Ghani MU; Hao T; Liu H J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(4):517-29. PubMed ID: 26410662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Theory, method, and test tools for determination of 3D MTF characteristics in cone-beam CT. Wu P; Boone JM; Hernandez AM; Mahesh M; Siewerdsen JH Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 48(6):2772-2789. PubMed ID: 33660261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sinusoidal modulation analysis for optical system MTF measurements. Boone JM; Yu T; Seibert JA Med Phys; 1996 Dec; 23(12):1955-63. PubMed ID: 8994160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of edge analysis techniques for the determination of the MTF of digital radiographic systems. Samei E; Buhr E; Granfors P; Vandenbroucke D; Wang X Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3613-25. PubMed ID: 16030386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [A method of measuring presampled modulation transfer function using a rationalized approximation of geometrical edge slope]. Honda M Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Apr; 70(4):346-58. PubMed ID: 24759215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental comparison of flat-panel detector performance for direct and indirect systems. Gomi T; Miyagawa J; Hirano H Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Dec; 61(12):1675-80. PubMed ID: 16395244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems. Samei E; Flynn MJ Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):608-22. PubMed ID: 12722813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Techniques to improve the accuracy of presampling MTF measurement in digital X-ray imaging based on constrained spline regression. Zhou Z; Zhu Q; Zhao H; Zhang L; Ma W; Gao F IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Apr; 61(4):1339-49. PubMed ID: 24658257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors. Samei E Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1747-57. PubMed ID: 12906192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Photon-counting hexagonal pixel array CdTe detector: Spatial resolution characteristics for image-guided interventional applications. Vedantham S; Shrestha S; Karellas A; Shi L; Gounis MJ; Bellazzini R; Spandre G; Brez A; Minuti M Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2118. PubMed ID: 27147324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]