These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
538 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23040538)
1. Automated assessment of heart chamber volumes and function in patients with previous myocardial infarction using multidetector computed tomography. Fuchs A; Kühl JT; Lønborg J; Engstrøm T; Vejlstrup N; Køber L; Kofoed KF J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2012; 6(5):325-34. PubMed ID: 23040538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cardiac chamber volumes, function, and mass as determined by 64-multidetector row computed tomography: mean values among healthy adults free of hypertension and obesity. Lin FY; Devereux RB; Roman MJ; Meng J; Jow VM; Jacobs A; Weinsaft JW; Shaw LJ; Berman DS; Callister TQ; Min JK JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Nov; 1(6):782-6. PubMed ID: 19356515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transthoracic 3D Echocardiographic Left Heart Chamber Quantification Using an Automated Adaptive Analytics Algorithm. Tsang W; Salgo IS; Medvedofsky D; Takeuchi M; Prater D; Weinert L; Yamat M; Mor-Avi V; Patel AR; Lang RM JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 9(7):769-782. PubMed ID: 27318718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance. Raman SV; Shah M; McCarthy B; Garcia A; Ferketich AK Am Heart J; 2006 Mar; 151(3):736-44. PubMed ID: 16504643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating global and regional left ventricular function in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction by 64-slice multidetector CT: a comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. Sarwar A; Shapiro MD; Nasir K; Nieman K; Nomura CH; Brady TJ; Cury RC J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(3):170-7. PubMed ID: 19527893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of left atrial volume and function: a comparative study between echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging and multi slice computed tomography. Kühl JT; Lønborg J; Fuchs A; Andersen MJ; Vejlstrup N; Kelbæk H; Engstrøm T; Møller JE; Kofoed KF Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jun; 28(5):1061-71. PubMed ID: 21847562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Meta-analysis of global left ventricular function comparing multidetector computed tomography with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Sharma A; Einstein AJ; Vallakati A; Arbab-Zadeh A; Mukherjee D; Lichstein E Am J Cardiol; 2014 Feb; 113(4):731-8. PubMed ID: 24355312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of left atrial volume and function in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation: comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, 320-slice multi-detector computed tomography, and transthoracic echocardiography. Agner BF; Kühl JT; Linde JJ; Kofoed KF; Åkeson P; Rasmussen BV; Jensen GB; Dixen U Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 May; 15(5):532-40. PubMed ID: 24247925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative values of gated blood-pool SPECT and CMR for ejection fraction and volume estimation. Sibille L; Bouallegue FB; Bourdon A; Micheau A; Vernhet-Kovacsik H; Mariano-Goulart D Nucl Med Commun; 2011 Feb; 32(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 21057340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of global left ventricular function with dual-source computed tomography in patients with valvular heart disease. Bak SH; Ko SM; Jeon HJ; Yang HS; Hwang HK; Song MG Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):270-7. PubMed ID: 22319133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantification of left ventricular parameters obtained by automated software for 64-slice multidetector computed tomography and comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Akram K; Anderson HD; Voros S Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2009 Nov; 32(6):1154-60. PubMed ID: 19771473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative assessment of primary mitral regurgitation using left ventricular volumes obtained with new automated three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic software: A comparison with 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance. Levy F; Marechaux S; Iacuzio L; Schouver ED; Castel AL; Toledano M; Rusek S; Dor V; Tribouilloy C; Dreyfus G Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2018; 111(8-9):507-517. PubMed ID: 29610031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility of New Transthoracic Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Automated Software for Left Heart Chamber Quantification in Children. Amadieu R; Hadeed K; Jaffro M; Karsenty C; Ratsimandresy M; Dulac Y; Acar P J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2019 Jan; 32(1):121-134.e1. PubMed ID: 30241929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of new automated transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiographic software for left ventricular volumes and function assessment in routine clinical practice: Comparison with 3 Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance. Levy F; Dan Schouver E; Iacuzio L; Civaia F; Rusek S; Dommerc C; Marechaux S; Dor V; Tribouilloy C; Dreyfus G Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2017 Nov; 110(11):580-589. PubMed ID: 28566200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Left ventricular and left atrial dimensions and volumes: comparison between dual-source CT and echocardiography. Stolzmann P; Scheffel H; Trindade PT; Plass AR; Husmann L; Leschka S; Genoni M; Marincek B; Kaufmann PA; Alkadhi H Invest Radiol; 2008 May; 43(5):284-9. PubMed ID: 18424948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative Assessment of Right Ventricular Volumes and Ejection Fraction in Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction by Real Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography versus Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Kim J; Cohen SB; Atalay MK; Maslow AD; Poppas A Echocardiography; 2015 May; 32(5):805-12. PubMed ID: 25109323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extent of RV dysfunction and myocardial infarction assessed by CMR are independent outcome predictors early after STEMI treated with primary angioplasty. Miszalski-Jamka T; Klimeczek P; Tomala M; Krupiński M; Zawadowski G; Noelting J; Lada M; Sip K; Banyś R; Mazur W; Kereiakes DJ; Zmudka K; Pasowicz M JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Dec; 3(12):1237-46. PubMed ID: 21163452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT for evaluation of myocardial cell therapy in heart failure: a comparison with CMR imaging. Schuleri KH; Centola M; Choi SH; Evers KS; Dawoud F; George RT; Lima JA; Lardo AC JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Dec; 4(12):1284-93. PubMed ID: 22172785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function: side-by-side comparison of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with magnetic resonance reference. Sugeng L; Mor-Avi V; Weinert L; Niel J; Ebner C; Steringer-Mascherbauer R; Schmidt F; Galuschky C; Schummers G; Lang RM; Nesser HJ Circulation; 2006 Aug; 114(7):654-61. PubMed ID: 16894035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and reproducibility of quantitation of left ventricular function by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography versus cardiac magnetic resonance. Soliman OI; Kirschbaum SW; van Dalen BM; van der Zwaan HB; Mahdavian Delavary B; Vletter WB; van Geuns RJ; Ten Cate FJ; Geleijnse ML Am J Cardiol; 2008 Sep; 102(6):778-83. PubMed ID: 18774006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]