540 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23040538)
1. Automated assessment of heart chamber volumes and function in patients with previous myocardial infarction using multidetector computed tomography.
Fuchs A; Kühl JT; Lønborg J; Engstrøm T; Vejlstrup N; Køber L; Kofoed KF
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2012; 6(5):325-34. PubMed ID: 23040538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cardiac chamber volumes, function, and mass as determined by 64-multidetector row computed tomography: mean values among healthy adults free of hypertension and obesity.
Lin FY; Devereux RB; Roman MJ; Meng J; Jow VM; Jacobs A; Weinsaft JW; Shaw LJ; Berman DS; Callister TQ; Min JK
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Nov; 1(6):782-6. PubMed ID: 19356515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transthoracic 3D Echocardiographic Left Heart Chamber Quantification Using an Automated Adaptive Analytics Algorithm.
Tsang W; Salgo IS; Medvedofsky D; Takeuchi M; Prater D; Weinert L; Yamat M; Mor-Avi V; Patel AR; Lang RM
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 9(7):769-782. PubMed ID: 27318718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance.
Raman SV; Shah M; McCarthy B; Garcia A; Ferketich AK
Am Heart J; 2006 Mar; 151(3):736-44. PubMed ID: 16504643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating global and regional left ventricular function in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction by 64-slice multidetector CT: a comparison to magnetic resonance imaging.
Sarwar A; Shapiro MD; Nasir K; Nieman K; Nomura CH; Brady TJ; Cury RC
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(3):170-7. PubMed ID: 19527893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of left atrial volume and function: a comparative study between echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging and multi slice computed tomography.
Kühl JT; Lønborg J; Fuchs A; Andersen MJ; Vejlstrup N; Kelbæk H; Engstrøm T; Møller JE; Kofoed KF
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jun; 28(5):1061-71. PubMed ID: 21847562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Meta-analysis of global left ventricular function comparing multidetector computed tomography with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Sharma A; Einstein AJ; Vallakati A; Arbab-Zadeh A; Mukherjee D; Lichstein E
Am J Cardiol; 2014 Feb; 113(4):731-8. PubMed ID: 24355312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of left atrial volume and function in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation: comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, 320-slice multi-detector computed tomography, and transthoracic echocardiography.
Agner BF; Kühl JT; Linde JJ; Kofoed KF; Åkeson P; Rasmussen BV; Jensen GB; Dixen U
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 May; 15(5):532-40. PubMed ID: 24247925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative values of gated blood-pool SPECT and CMR for ejection fraction and volume estimation.
Sibille L; Bouallegue FB; Bourdon A; Micheau A; Vernhet-Kovacsik H; Mariano-Goulart D
Nucl Med Commun; 2011 Feb; 32(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 21057340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of global left ventricular function with dual-source computed tomography in patients with valvular heart disease.
Bak SH; Ko SM; Jeon HJ; Yang HS; Hwang HK; Song MG
Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):270-7. PubMed ID: 22319133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantification of left ventricular parameters obtained by automated software for 64-slice multidetector computed tomography and comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
Akram K; Anderson HD; Voros S
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2009 Nov; 32(6):1154-60. PubMed ID: 19771473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative assessment of primary mitral regurgitation using left ventricular volumes obtained with new automated three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic software: A comparison with 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance.
Levy F; Marechaux S; Iacuzio L; Schouver ED; Castel AL; Toledano M; Rusek S; Dor V; Tribouilloy C; Dreyfus G
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2018; 111(8-9):507-517. PubMed ID: 29610031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility of New Transthoracic Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Automated Software for Left Heart Chamber Quantification in Children.
Amadieu R; Hadeed K; Jaffro M; Karsenty C; Ratsimandresy M; Dulac Y; Acar P
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2019 Jan; 32(1):121-134.e1. PubMed ID: 30241929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of new automated transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiographic software for left ventricular volumes and function assessment in routine clinical practice: Comparison with 3 Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance.
Levy F; Dan Schouver E; Iacuzio L; Civaia F; Rusek S; Dommerc C; Marechaux S; Dor V; Tribouilloy C; Dreyfus G
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2017 Nov; 110(11):580-589. PubMed ID: 28566200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Left ventricular and left atrial dimensions and volumes: comparison between dual-source CT and echocardiography.
Stolzmann P; Scheffel H; Trindade PT; Plass AR; Husmann L; Leschka S; Genoni M; Marincek B; Kaufmann PA; Alkadhi H
Invest Radiol; 2008 May; 43(5):284-9. PubMed ID: 18424948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative Assessment of Right Ventricular Volumes and Ejection Fraction in Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction by Real Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography versus Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Kim J; Cohen SB; Atalay MK; Maslow AD; Poppas A
Echocardiography; 2015 May; 32(5):805-12. PubMed ID: 25109323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extent of RV dysfunction and myocardial infarction assessed by CMR are independent outcome predictors early after STEMI treated with primary angioplasty.
Miszalski-Jamka T; Klimeczek P; Tomala M; Krupiński M; Zawadowski G; Noelting J; Lada M; Sip K; Banyś R; Mazur W; Kereiakes DJ; Zmudka K; Pasowicz M
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Dec; 3(12):1237-46. PubMed ID: 21163452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT for evaluation of myocardial cell therapy in heart failure: a comparison with CMR imaging.
Schuleri KH; Centola M; Choi SH; Evers KS; Dawoud F; George RT; Lima JA; Lardo AC
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Dec; 4(12):1284-93. PubMed ID: 22172785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function: side-by-side comparison of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with magnetic resonance reference.
Sugeng L; Mor-Avi V; Weinert L; Niel J; Ebner C; Steringer-Mascherbauer R; Schmidt F; Galuschky C; Schummers G; Lang RM; Nesser HJ
Circulation; 2006 Aug; 114(7):654-61. PubMed ID: 16894035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and reproducibility of quantitation of left ventricular function by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography versus cardiac magnetic resonance.
Soliman OI; Kirschbaum SW; van Dalen BM; van der Zwaan HB; Mahdavian Delavary B; Vletter WB; van Geuns RJ; Ten Cate FJ; Geleijnse ML
Am J Cardiol; 2008 Sep; 102(6):778-83. PubMed ID: 18774006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
