These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23041181)

  • 1. Higher, faster, stronger: the effect of dynamic stimuli on response preparation and CNV amplitude.
    Linssen AM; Sambeth A; Riedel WJ; Vuurman EF
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Jan; 237():308-12. PubMed ID: 23041181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Error-related negativity in a visual go/no-go task: children vs. adults.
    Kim EY; Iwaki N; Imashioya H; Uno H; Fujita T
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2007; 31(2):181-91. PubMed ID: 17488215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response inhibition and attention processing in 5- to 7-year-old children with and without symptoms of ADHD: An ERP study.
    Spronk M; Jonkman LM; Kemner C
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Dec; 119(12):2738-52. PubMed ID: 18951061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological markers of the motivational salience of delay imposition and escape.
    Broyd SJ; Richards HJ; Helps SK; Chronaki G; Bamford S; Sonuga-Barke EJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Apr; 50(5):965-72. PubMed ID: 22349443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 16214250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distraction in a continuous-stimulation detection task.
    Horváth J; Winkler I
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Mar; 83(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 20064580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of task preparation in task switching as reflected on lateralized readiness potential.
    Hsieh S; Chen P
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Jan; 63(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 17027109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive control of response preparedness in task switching.
    Steinhauser M; Hübner R; Druey M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1826-35. PubMed ID: 19428414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of response type (motor output versus mental counting) on the intracerebral distribution of the slow cortical potentials in an externally cued (CNV) paradigm.
    Bares M; Nestrasil I; Rektor I
    Brain Res Bull; 2007 Jan; 71(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 17208661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of preparatory activity indexed by the contingent negative variation in children.
    Flores AB; Digiacomo MR; Meneres S; Trigo E; Gómez CM
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Nov; 71(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 19500893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of ageing on cognitive task preparation as reflected by event-related potentials.
    Wild-Wall N; Hohnsbein J; Falkenstein M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):558-69. PubMed ID: 17208044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Personality and the effects of acute alcohol intake. A contingent negative variation study in healthy subjects.
    Fattapposta F; Venturi P; Carella Prada O; Costamagna L; D'Alessio C; Mostarda M; Mina C; Parisi L; Pirro C; Amabile G
    Funct Neurol; 2004; 19(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15212113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trial-by-trial fluctuations in CNV amplitude reflect anticipatory adjustment of response caution.
    Boehm U; van Maanen L; Forstmann B; van Rijn H
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():95-105. PubMed ID: 24699015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Slow cortical potential shifts preceding sensorimotor interactions.
    Babiloni C; Brancucci A; Capotosto P; Romani GL; Arendt-Nielsen L; Chen AC; Rossini PM
    Brain Res Bull; 2005 Apr; 65(4):309-16. PubMed ID: 15811596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mental fatigue and impaired response processes: event-related brain potentials in a Go/NoGo task.
    Kato Y; Endo H; Kizuka T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 19135100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brain dynamics in the auditory oddball task as a function of stimulus intensity and task requirements.
    Barry RJ; Rushby JA; Smith JL; Clarke AR; Croft RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):313-25. PubMed ID: 19460406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Error processing in major depressive disorder: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Ruchsow M; Herrnberger B; Beschoner P; Grön G; Spitzer M; Kiefer M
    J Psychiatr Res; 2006 Feb; 40(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 15882872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ERPs on a continuous performance task and self-reported psychopathic traits: P3 and CNV augmentation are associated with Fearless Dominance.
    Carlson SR; Thái S
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Oct; 85(2):318-30. PubMed ID: 20723576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.