90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23041366)
1. [Cost-effectiveness of a chemotherapy predictive test].
Vataire AL; Laas E; Aballéa S; Gligorov J; Rouzier R; Chéreau E
Bull Cancer; 2012 Oct; 99(10):907-14. PubMed ID: 23041366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using the 21-gene assay to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making in early-stage breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness evaluation in the German setting.
Blohmer JU; Rezai M; Kümmel S; Kühn T; Warm M; Friedrichs K; Benkow A; Valentine WJ; Eiermann W
J Med Econ; 2013; 16(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 22966753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Economic Impact of Gene Expression Profiling in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer in France.
Katz G; Romano O; Foa C; Vataire AL; Chantelard JV; Hervé R; Barletta H; Durieux A; Martin JP; Salmon R
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128880. PubMed ID: 26086912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term cost-effectiveness of Oncotype DX® versus current clinical practice from a Dutch cost perspective.
Kip M; Monteban H; Steuten L
J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Sep; 4(5):433-45. PubMed ID: 25872415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost effectiveness of gene expression profiling for early stage breast cancer: a decision-analytic model.
Yang M; Rajan S; Issa AM
Cancer; 2012 Oct; 118(20):5163-70. PubMed ID: 22359236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting for treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer.
Garrison LP; Lubeck D; Lalla D; Paton V; Dueck A; Perez EA
Cancer; 2007 Aug; 110(3):489-98. PubMed ID: 17592827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of extended adjuvant letrozole therapy after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer.
Delea TE; Karnon J; Smith RE; Johnston SR; Brandman J; Sung JC; Gross PE
Am J Manag Care; 2006 Jul; 12(7):374-86. PubMed ID: 16834524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genomic profile of breast cancer: cost-effectiveness analysis from the Spanish National Healthcare System perspective.
Seguí MÁ; Crespo C; Cortés J; Lluch A; Brosa M; Becerra V; Chiavenna SM; Gracia A
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2014 Dec; 14(6):889-99. PubMed ID: 25213317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Economic assessment of the routine use of Oncotype DX® assay for early breast cancer in Franche-Comte region].
Nerich V; Curtit E; Bazan F; Montcuquet P; Villanueva C; Chaigneau L; Cals L; Méneveau N; Dobi E; Altmotlak H; Algros MP; Choulot MJ; Nallet G; Limat S; Mansion S; Pivot X
Bull Cancer; 2014; 101(7-8):681-9. PubMed ID: 25091650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Economic implications of 21-gene breast cancer risk assay from the perspective of an Israeli-managed health-care organization.
Klang SH; Hammerman A; Liebermann N; Efrat N; Doberne J; Hornberger J
Value Health; 2010; 13(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 20412544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in early breast cancer patients: a Swiss cost-effectiveness analysis of different predictive assay strategies.
Blank PR; Schwenkglenks M; Moch H; Szucs TD
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Nov; 124(2):497-507. PubMed ID: 20364309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost effectiveness of adjuvant trastuzumab in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer.
Liberato NL; Marchetti M; Barosi G
J Clin Oncol; 2007 Feb; 25(6):625-33. PubMed ID: 17308267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the potential cost-effectiveness of retesting IHC0, IHC1+, or FISH-negative early stage breast cancer patients for HER2 status.
Garrison LP; Lalla D; Brammer M; Babigumira JB; Wang B; Perez EA
Cancer; 2013 Sep; 119(17):3113-22. PubMed ID: 23775560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Health economic analysis of Breast Cancer Index in patients with ER+, LN- breast cancer.
Gustavsen G; Schroeder B; Kennedy P; Pothier KC; Erlander MG; Schnabel CA; Ali H
Am J Manag Care; 2014 Aug; 20(8):e302-10. PubMed ID: 25295793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is adjuvant therapy for older patients with node (+) early breast cancer cost-effective?
Naeim A; Keeler EB
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2005 Nov; 94(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 16261407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-utility of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in node-negative and node-positive breast cancer.
Lamond NW; Skedgel C; Rayson D; Lethbridge L; Younis T
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Jun; 133(3):1115-23. PubMed ID: 22361999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benefit and projected cost-effectiveness of anastrozole versus tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy for patients with early-stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
Hillner BE
Cancer; 2004 Sep; 101(6):1311-22. PubMed ID: 15368322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Economic evaluation of intensive chemotherapy with prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for patients with high-risk early breast cancer in Japan.
Ishiguro H; Kondo M; Hoshi SL; Takada M; Nakamura S; Teramukai S; Yanagihara K; Toi M
Clin Ther; 2010 Feb; 32(2):311-26. PubMed ID: 20206789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of 21-gene assay in node-positive, early-stage breast cancer.
Vanderlaan BF; Broder MS; Chang EY; Oratz R; Bentley TG
Am J Manag Care; 2011; 17(7):455-64. PubMed ID: 21819166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A cost-effectiveness analysis of adjuvant trastuzumab regimens in early HER2/neu-positive breast cancer.
Kurian AW; Thompson RN; Gaw AF; Arai S; Ortiz R; Garber AM
J Clin Oncol; 2007 Feb; 25(6):634-41. PubMed ID: 17308268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
