These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23041526)

  • 1. Statistical inference and multiple testing correction in classification-based multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA): random permutations and cluster size control.
    Stelzer J; Chen Y; Turner R
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 65():69-82. PubMed ID: 23041526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonstationary cluster-size inference with random field and permutation methods.
    Hayasaka S; Phan KL; Liberzon I; Worsley KJ; Nichols TE
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jun; 22(2):676-87. PubMed ID: 15193596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analyses of regional-average activation and multivoxel pattern information tell complementary stories.
    Jimura K; Poldrack RA
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Mar; 50(4):544-52. PubMed ID: 22100534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decoding the individual finger movements from single-trial functional magnetic resonance imaging recordings of human brain activity.
    Shen G; Zhang J; Wang M; Lei D; Yang G; Zhang S; Du X
    Eur J Neurosci; 2014 Jun; 39(12):2071-82. PubMed ID: 24661456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combining voxel intensity and cluster extent with permutation test framework.
    Hayasaka S; Nichols TE
    Neuroimage; 2004 Sep; 23(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 15325352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of volume-based and surface-based multi-voxel pattern analysis.
    Oosterhof NN; Wiestler T; Downing PE; Diedrichsen J
    Neuroimage; 2011 May; 56(2):593-600. PubMed ID: 20621701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining multivariate voxel selection and support vector machines for mapping and classification of fMRI spatial patterns.
    De Martino F; Valente G; Staeren N; Ashburner J; Goebel R; Formisano E
    Neuroimage; 2008 Oct; 43(1):44-58. PubMed ID: 18672070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of a large fMRI cohort: Statistical and methodological issues for group analyses.
    Thirion B; Pinel P; Mériaux S; Roche A; Dehaene S; Poline JB
    Neuroimage; 2007 Mar; 35(1):105-20. PubMed ID: 17239619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A high performance 3D cluster-based test of unsmoothed fMRI data.
    Li H; Nickerson LD; Xiong J; Zou Q; Fan Y; Ma Y; Shi T; Ge J; Gao JH
    Neuroimage; 2014 Sep; 98():537-46. PubMed ID: 24836011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cluster mass inference via random field theory.
    Zhang H; Nichols TE; Johnson TD
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 18805493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimization of functional MRI for detection, decoding and high-resolution imaging of the response patterns of cortical columns.
    Chaimow D; Uğurbil K; Shmuel A
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jan; 164():67-99. PubMed ID: 28461061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An empirical comparison of surface-based and volume-based group studies in neuroimaging.
    Tucholka A; Fritsch V; Poline JB; Thirion B
    Neuroimage; 2012 Nov; 63(3):1443-53. PubMed ID: 22732555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confounds in multivariate pattern analysis: Theory and rule representation case study.
    Todd MT; Nystrom LE; Cohen JD
    Neuroimage; 2013 Aug; 77():157-65. PubMed ID: 23558095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. fMRI pattern classification using neuroanatomically constrained boosting.
    Martínez-Ramón M; Koltchinskii V; Heileman GL; Posse S
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jul; 31(3):1129-41. PubMed ID: 16529955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation and optimization of fMRI single-subject processing pipelines with NPAIRS and second-level CVA.
    Zhang J; Anderson JR; Liang L; Pulapura SK; Gatewood L; Rottenberg DA; Strother SC
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Feb; 27(2):264-78. PubMed ID: 18849131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of activation pattern estimates and statistical significance tests in fMRI decoding analysis.
    Arco JE; González-García C; Díaz-Gutiérrez P; Ramírez J; Ruz M
    J Neurosci Methods; 2018 Oct; 308():248-260. PubMed ID: 30352691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Structural analysis of fMRI data revisited: improving the sensitivity and reliability of fMRI group studies.
    Thirion B; Pinel P; Tucholka A; Roche A; Ciuciu P; Mangin JF; Poline JB
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(9):1256-69. PubMed ID: 17896597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cluster-based analysis of FMRI data.
    Heller R; Stanley D; Yekutieli D; Rubin N; Benjamini Y
    Neuroimage; 2006 Nov; 33(2):599-608. PubMed ID: 16952467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decoding Accuracy in Supplementary Motor Cortex Correlates with Perceptual Sensitivity to Tactile Roughness.
    Kim J; Chung YG; Park JY; Chung SC; Wallraven C; Bülthoff HH; Kim SP
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129777. PubMed ID: 26067832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensible decoding.
    Carlson TA; Wardle SG
    Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 110():217-8. PubMed ID: 25680521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.