These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23041802)

  • 1. Contribution of a winged phlebotomy device design to blood splatter.
    Haiduven DJ; McGuire-Wolfe C; Applegarth SP
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 33(11):1069-76. PubMed ID: 23041802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An experimental method for detecting blood splatter from retractable phlebotomy and intravascular devices.
    Haiduven D; Applegarth S; Shroff M
    Am J Infect Control; 2009 Mar; 37(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 19249639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of visual versus microscopic methods to detect blood splatter from an intravascular catheter with engineered sharps injury protection.
    Ansari A; Ramaiah P; Collazo L; Salihu HM; Haiduven D
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 34(11):1174-80. PubMed ID: 24113601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comprehensive approach to percutaneous injury prevention during phlebotomy: results of a multicenter study, 1993-1995.
    Alvarado-Ramy F; Beltrami EM; Short LJ; Srivastava PU; Henry K; Mendelson M; Gerberding JL; Delclos GL; Campbell S; Solomon R; Fahrner R; Culver DH; Bell D; Cardo DM; Chamberland ME
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2003 Feb; 24(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 12602691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of sharp safety blood evacuation devices.
    Ford J; Phillips P
    Nurs Stand; 2011 Jun 29-Jul 5; 25(43):41-7. PubMed ID: 21847867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a safety resheathable winged steel needle for prevention of percutaneous injuries associated with intravascular-access procedures among healthcare workers.
    Mendelson MH; Lin-Chen BY; Solomon R; Bailey E; Kogan G; Goldbold J
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2003 Feb; 24(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 12602692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Model-Based Product Evaluation Protocol for Comparison of Safety-Engineered Protection Mechanisms of Winged Blood Collection Needles.
    Haupt C; Spaeth J; Ahne T; Goebel U; Steinmann D
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2016 May; 37(5):505-11. PubMed ID: 26868306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of safety-engineered devices by healthcare workers for intravenous and/or phlebotomy procedures in healthcare settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ballout RA; Diab B; Harb AC; Tarabay R; Khamassi S; Akl EA
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Sep; 16():458. PubMed ID: 27581947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hazard report: needlestick injury using the Marquest/vital signs PeachCapp sliding clip with arterial blood gas syringes.
    Healthc Hazard Manage Monit; 2002 Feb; 15(6):3. PubMed ID: 11828589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disposable protective eyewear devices for health care providers. How important are they and will available designs be used?
    Garrett SJ; Robinson JK
    J Occup Med; 1993 Oct; 35(10):1043-7. PubMed ID: 8271076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of laboratory values obtained by phlebotomy versus saline lock devices.
    Corbo J; Fu L; Silver M; Atallah H; Bijur P
    Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Jan; 14(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 17099189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating sharps safety devices: meeting OSHA's intent. Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
    Pugliese G; Germanson TP; Bartley J; Luca J; Lamerato L; Cox J; Jagger J
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2001 Jul; 22(7):456-8. PubMed ID: 11583216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Splatter during jet irrigation cleansing of a wound model: a comparison of three inexpensive devices.
    Pigman EC; Karch DB; Scott JL
    Ann Emerg Med; 1993 Oct; 22(10):1563-7. PubMed ID: 8214836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk of ocular blood splatter during oculofacial plastic surgery.
    Stacey AW; Czyz CN; Kondapalli SS; Hill RH; Everman KR; Cahill KV; Foster JA
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015; 31(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 25126769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Provision and use of personal protective equipment and safety devices in the National Study to Prevent Blood Exposure in Paramedics.
    Mathews R; Leiss JK; Lyden JT; Sousa S; Ratcliffe JM; Jagger J
    Am J Infect Control; 2008 Dec; 36(10):743-9. PubMed ID: 18834754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fluid dispersal from safety cannulas: an in vitro comparative test.
    Rosenthal VD; Hughes G
    Am J Infect Control; 2015 Mar; 43(3):305-7. PubMed ID: 25728160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of safety devices and the prevention of percutaneous injuries among healthcare workers.
    Valls V; Lozano MS; Yánez R; Martínez MJ; Pascual F; Lloret J; Ruiz JA
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 28(12):1352-60. PubMed ID: 17994515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of safety devices for preventing percutaneous injuries among health-care workers during phlebotomy procedures--Minneapolis-St. Paul, New York City, and San Francisco, 1993-1995.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1997 Jan; 46(2):21-5. PubMed ID: 9011778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A quantitative assessment of facial protection systems in elective hip arthroplasty.
    Hirpara KM; O'Halloran E; O'Sullivan M
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2011 Jun; 77(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 21846007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stick to OSHA rules.
    Harty-Golder B
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2003 Dec; 35(12):28. PubMed ID: 14699992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.