These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23041987)

  • 1. Intraoral foreign bodies detected 40 years after a car accident using cone beam computed tomography.
    Schnider N; Reichart PA; Bornstein MM
    Quintessence Int; 2012 Oct; 43(9):741-5. PubMed ID: 23041987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Foreign Body Mimicking a Dental Implant Radiographically.
    Demirkol M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 26(8):e738-9. PubMed ID: 26594991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of a digital guide in the removal of foreign body from the maxillofacial region.
    Ma W; Wang LD; Liang Y; Li M
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Sep; 57(7):708-709. PubMed ID: 31221446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of cone beam computed tomography in the management of glass injuries to the face.
    Sadiq Z; Bisase B; Coombes DM
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jun; 48(4):308-9. PubMed ID: 19748712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visibility of Different Intraorbital Foreign Bodies Using Plain Radiography, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: An In Vitro Study.
    Javadrashid R; Golamian M; Shahrzad M; Hajalioghli P; Shahmorady Z; Fouladi DF; Sadrarhami S; Akhoundzadeh L
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2017 May; 68(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 26899378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of foreign bodies by spiral computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in maxillofacial regions.
    Kaviani F; Javad Rashid R; Shahmoradi Z; Gholamian M
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2014; 8(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 25346836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of different foreign bodies in the maxillofacial region with spiral computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography: An in vitro study.
    Abolvardi M; Akhlaghian M; Hamidi Shishvan H; Dastan F
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2020 Dec; 50(4):291-298. PubMed ID: 33409137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative Sensitivity Assessment of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Digital Radiography for detecting Foreign Bodies.
    Lari SS; Shokri A; Hosseinipanah SM; Rostami S; Sabounchi SS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Mar; 17(3):224-9. PubMed ID: 27207202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Foreign body granuloma in the maxillofacial region: a case report.
    ; Zuccarino L; Villani M; Carinci F; Barlattani A; Ottria L
    J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2019; 33(6 Suppl. 2):209-213. PubMed ID: 32338475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment of scattered glass foreign bodies in both the superficial and deep neck: a case report.
    Narita N; Yamada T; Imoto Y; Ogi K; Sakashita M; Ito Y; Kouraba S; Yasuta M; Tsuzuki H; Fujieda S
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2005 Sep; 32(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 15869854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrieval of extensive gutta-percha extruded into the maxillary sinus: use of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography.
    Brooks JK; Kleinman JW
    J Endod; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1189-93. PubMed ID: 23953297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Foreign bodies in the interior of the maxillary sinus: diagnosis by cone beam computed tomography.
    da Costa ED; Peyneau PD; Verner FS; Almeida SM; Ambrosano GMB
    Gen Dent; 2018; 66(3):38-40. PubMed ID: 29714698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of cone beam computed tomography to detect and remove a broken suture needle.
    Hassani A; Motamedi MH; Sadrimanesh R; Varshosaz M; Moshiri R; Vahdati SA; Sadr-Eshkevari P
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(6):534-6. PubMed ID: 21062723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cone beam CT imaging of airgun injuries to the craniomaxillofacial region.
    Stuehmer C; Essig H; Bormann KH; Majdani O; Gellrich NC; Rücker M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 37(10):903-6. PubMed ID: 18768294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Removal of a maxillary third molar accidentally displaced into the infratemporal fossa via intraoral approach under local anesthesia: report of a case.
    Sverzut CE; Trivellato AE; Sverzut AT; de Matos FP; Kato RB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jun; 67(6):1316-20. PubMed ID: 19446223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Commentary: Palatal mucosal measurements in a Japanese population using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Murphy KG
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 24548317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optical surgical navigation-assisted removal of a foreign body using a splint to simplify the registration process: a case report.
    Sukegawa S; Yoneda S; Kanno T; Tohmori H; Furuki Y
    J Med Case Rep; 2019 Jul; 13(1):209. PubMed ID: 31287008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple glass pieces in paranasal sinuses.
    Mohiuddin SA; Rahiman S; Sultana S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):847-9. PubMed ID: 22484883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Veteran's shrapnel in the maxillofacial region.
    Almog DM; Ferrara M; Cheng K
    Alpha Omegan; 2010 Dec; 103(4):157-9. PubMed ID: 21313968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of Visibility of Foreign Bodies in the Maxillofacial Region: Comparison of Computed Tomography, Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Valizadeh S; Pouraliakbar H; Kiani L; Safi Y; Alibakhshi L
    Iran J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 13(4):e37265. PubMed ID: 27895878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.