These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2304212)

  • 1. Variation in journal peer review systems. Possible causes and consequences.
    Hargens LL
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1348-52. PubMed ID: 2304212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review processes at the Health Information and Libraries Journal.
    Grant MJ
    Health Info Libr J; 2018 Dec; 35(4):263-264. PubMed ID: 30499172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Avoiding predatory journals: Quick peer review processes too good to be true.
    Edie AH; Conklin JL
    Nurs Forum; 2019 Jul; 54(3):336-339. PubMed ID: 30802310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Who are the peer reviewers and how much do they review?
    Yankauer A
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1338-40. PubMed ID: 2304210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process.
    Earnshaw JJ; Farndon JR; Guillou PJ; Johnson CD; Murie JA; Murray GD
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2000 Apr; 82(4 Suppl):133-5. PubMed ID: 10889776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
    Nahata MC
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
    Enquselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Editorial peer review in US medical journals.
    Weller AC
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1344-7. PubMed ID: 2406471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review guidance: how do you write a good review?
    Allen TW
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2013 Dec; 113(12):916-20. PubMed ID: 24285034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals. A continuing peer review problem.
    Evans JT; Nadjari HI; Burchell SA
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1353-4. PubMed ID: 2304213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial.
    McNutt RA; Evans AT; Fletcher RH; Fletcher SW
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1371-6. PubMed ID: 2304216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What can and should be done to reduce publication bias? The perspective of an editor.
    Sharp DW
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1390-1. PubMed ID: 2304218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
    Armstrong AW; Idriss SZ; Kimball AB; Bernhard JD
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 58(4):632-5. PubMed ID: 18249470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of journal ranking schemes as a tool for locating information.
    Stringer MJ; Sales-Pardo M; Nunes Amaral LA
    PLoS One; 2008 Feb; 3(2):e1683. PubMed ID: 18301760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A retrospective analysis of submissions, acceptance rate, open peer review operations, and prepublication bias of the multidisciplinary open access journal Head & Face Medicine.
    Stamm T; Meyer U; Wiesmann HP; Kleinheinz J; Cehreli M; Cehreli ZC
    Head Face Med; 2007 Jun; 3():27. PubMed ID: 17562003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Editorial peer review: methodology and data collection.
    Weller AC
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1990 Jul; 78(3):258-70. PubMed ID: 2393756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fate of manuscripts rejected for publication in the AJR.
    Chew FS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Mar; 156(3):627-32. PubMed ID: 1899764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Editorial policy and the assessment of quality among medical journals.
    Weller AC
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1987 Oct; 75(4):310-6. PubMed ID: 3450342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consistency between peer reviewers for a clinical specialty journal.
    Cullen DJ; Macaulay A
    Acad Med; 1992 Dec; 67(12):856-9. PubMed ID: 1457023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.