These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23042158)

  • 1. Clinical implementation of chromosomal microarray technology in prenatal diagnosis. (Review).
    Kang JU; Koo SH
    Mol Med Rep; 2012 Dec; 6(6):1219-22. PubMed ID: 23042158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prenatal genetic diagnosis using microarray analysis in fetuses with congenital heart defects.
    Schmid M; Stary S; Blaicher W; Gollinger M; Husslein P; Streubel B
    Prenat Diagn; 2012 Apr; 32(4):376-82. PubMed ID: 22025351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnosing chromosomal abnormalities from "big" to "small" with molecular cytogenetic technology.
    Wilson RD; Blight C; Langlois S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 May; 31(5):414-21. PubMed ID: 19604422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of a DNA method, QF-PCR, in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies.
    Langlois S; Duncan A; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Sep; 33(9):955-960. PubMed ID: 21923994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic utility of microarray testing in pregnancy loss.
    Rosenfeld JA; Tucker ME; Escobar LF; Neill NJ; Torchia BS; McDaniel LD; Schultz RA; Chong K; Chitayat D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 46(4):478-86. PubMed ID: 25846569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of SNP-based chromosomal microarray and NIPT on the diagnostic yield in 10,000 fetuses with and without fetal ultrasound anomalies.
    Srebniak MI; Knapen MFCM; Polak M; Joosten M; Diderich KEM; Govaerts LCP; Boter M; Kromosoeto JNR; van Hassel DACM; Huijbregts G; van IJcken WFJ; Heydanus R; Dijkman A; Toolenaar T; de Vries FAT; Knijnenburg J; Go ATJI; Galjaard RH; Van Opstal D
    Hum Mutat; 2017 Jul; 38(7):880-888. PubMed ID: 28409863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolution of prenatal genetics: from point mutation testing to chromosomal microarray analysis.
    Roa BB; Pulliam J; Eng CM; Cheung SW
    Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2005 Nov; 5(6):883-92. PubMed ID: 16255630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of chromosomal microarray for prenatal diagnosis.
    ; Dugoff L; Norton ME; Kuller JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):B2-9. PubMed ID: 27427470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation in prenatal setting.
    Lovrecic L; Remec ZI; Volk M; Rudolf G; Writzl K; Peterlin B
    BMC Med Genet; 2016 Nov; 17(1):81. PubMed ID: 27846804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of microarray-based detection rates for cytogenetic abnormalities in prenatal and neonatal specimens.
    Shaffer LG; Coppinger J; Alliman S; Torchia BA; Theisen A; Ballif BC; Bejjani BA
    Prenat Diagn; 2008 Sep; 28(9):789-95. PubMed ID: 18646242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Molecular cytogenetic and rapid aneuploidy detection methods in prenatal diagnosis.
    Shaffer LG; Bui TH
    Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2007 Feb; 145C(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 17290441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prenatal diagnosis by chromosomal microarray analysis.
    Levy B; Wapner R
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Feb; 109(2):201-212. PubMed ID: 29447663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 446: array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 114(5):1161-1163. PubMed ID: 20168129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evolving applications of microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis.
    Savage MS; Mourad MJ; Wapner RJ
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Apr; 23(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 21297472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis.
    Wapner RJ; Martin CL; Levy B; Ballif BC; Eng CM; Zachary JM; Savage M; Platt LD; Saltzman D; Grobman WA; Klugman S; Scholl T; Simpson JL; McCall K; Aggarwal VS; Bunke B; Nahum O; Patel A; Lamb AN; Thom EA; Beaudet AL; Ledbetter DH; Shaffer LG; Jackson L
    N Engl J Med; 2012 Dec; 367(23):2175-84. PubMed ID: 23215555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integration of microarray technology into prenatal diagnosis: counselling issues generated during the NICHD clinical trial.
    Wapner RJ; Driscoll DA; Simpson JL
    Prenat Diagn; 2012 Apr; 32(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 22467170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chromosomal abnormalities not currently detected by cell-free fetal DNA: a retrospective analysis at a single center.
    Shani H; Goldwaser T; Keating J; Klugman S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 214(6):729.e1-729.e11. PubMed ID: 26721783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A cytogeneticist's perspective on genomic microarrays.
    Shaffer LG; Bejjani BA
    Hum Reprod Update; 2004; 10(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 15140869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Committee Opinion No. 581: the use of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 122(6):1374-7. PubMed ID: 24264715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Advances in rapid prenatal detection of fetal chromosome abnormalities].
    Wang J; Cui YX
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 Apr; 16(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 20626168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.