These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23043500)

  • 21. A comparative appraisal of two equivalence tests for multiple standardized effects.
    Shieh G
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Apr; 126():110-7. PubMed ID: 26777779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sample size determination for assessing equivalence based on proportion ratio under a randomized trial with non-compliance and missing outcomes.
    Lui KJ; Chang KC
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(1):47-67. PubMed ID: 17708514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Unadjusted Bivariate Two-Group Comparisons: When Simpler is Better.
    Vetter TR; Mascha EJ
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Jan; 126(1):338-342. PubMed ID: 29189214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparing the Performance of Approaches for Testing the Homogeneity of Variance Assumption in One-Factor ANOVA Models.
    Wang Y; Rodríguez de Gil P; Chen YH; Kromrey JD; Kim ES; Pham T; Nguyen D; Romano JL
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Apr; 77(2):305-329. PubMed ID: 29795915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Wald tests for variance-adjusted equivalence assessment with normal endpoints.
    Chen YM; Weng YT; Dong X; Tsong Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 27906607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A confidence-limit-based approach to the assessment of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
    Wellek S; Goddard KA; Ziegler A
    Biom J; 2010 Apr; 52(2):253-70. PubMed ID: 20394081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: an integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests.
    Tryon WW
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):371-86. PubMed ID: 11778678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Equivalence tests for comparing correlation and regression coefficients.
    Counsell A; Cribbie RA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 May; 68(2):292-309. PubMed ID: 25346486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Traditional and proposed tests of slope homogeneity for non-normal and heteroscedastic data.
    Moses TP; Klockars AJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Nov; 65(3):402-26. PubMed ID: 22053808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An effect size index for comparing two independent alpha coefficients.
    Liu HY; Weng LJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):385-400. PubMed ID: 18573226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Shelf life determination based on equivalence assessment.
    Tsong Y; Chen WJ; Lin TY; Chen CW
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Aug; 13(3):431-49. PubMed ID: 12921392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A mixture-model approach for parallel testing for unequal variances.
    Bar HY; Booth JG; Wells MT
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Jan; 11(1):Article 8. PubMed ID: 22499680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Controlling the Type I error rate by using the nonparametric bootstrap when comparing means.
    Parra-Frutos I
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Feb; 67(1):117-32. PubMed ID: 23647492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A bootstrap test for comparing two variances: simulation of size and power in small samples.
    Sun J; Chernick MR; LaBudde RA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Nov; 21(6):1079-93. PubMed ID: 22023677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Heteroscedastic one-factor models and marginal maximum likelihood estimation.
    Hessen DJ; Dolan CV
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):57-77. PubMed ID: 17935662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Type I error and statistical power of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure for detecting DIF: a meta-analysis.
    Guilera G; Gómez-Benito J; Hidalgo MD; Sánchez-Meca J
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Dec; 18(4):553-71. PubMed ID: 24127986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. New tests for null hypothesis of non unity ratio of proportions.
    Koti KM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):229-45. PubMed ID: 17365220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Testing two variances for superiority/non-inferiority and equivalence: Using the exhaustion algorithm for sample size allocation with cost.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 May; 73(2):316-332. PubMed ID: 31190402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Detecting a lack of association: an equivalence testing approach.
    Goertzen JR; Cribbie RA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):527-37. PubMed ID: 20030968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sample size planning for the noninferiority or equivalence of a linear contrast with cost considerations.
    Luh WM; Guo JH
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Mar; 21(1):13-34. PubMed ID: 26121080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.