These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2304400)

  • 1. The evolution of the American test for the admissibility of scientific evidence.
    Imwinkelried EJ
    Med Sci Law; 1990 Jan; 30(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 2304400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The admissibility of hypnotic evidence in U.S. Courts.
    Giannelli PC
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1995 Apr; 43(2):212-33. PubMed ID: 7737764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH; Friedman HJ
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
    Shapiro DL; Mixon L; Jackson M; Shook J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():149-53. PubMed ID: 26341310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Admissibility of scientific evidence in courts.
    Davies J
    Med Law; 2005 Jun; 24(2):243-57. PubMed ID: 16082863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The admissibility of offender profiling in courtroom: a review of legal issues and court opinions.
    Bosco D; Zappalà A; Santtila P
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2010; 33(3):184-91. PubMed ID: 20416950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk assessment in the law: legal admissibility, scientific validity, and some disparities between research and practice.
    Krauss DA; Scurich N
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 23613165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Admissibility of scientific evidence post-Daubert.
    Masten J; Strzelczyk JJ
    Health Phys; 2001 Dec; 81(6):678-82. PubMed ID: 11725886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: a new standard for scientific evidence in the courts?
    Zonana H
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):309-25. PubMed ID: 7841504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Admissibility and per se exclusion of hypnotically elicited recall in American courts of law.
    Perry C
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Jul; 45(3):266-79. PubMed ID: 9204639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychological evidence at the dawn of the law's scientific age.
    Faigman DL; Monahan J
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2005; 56():631-59. PubMed ID: 15709949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Science convicting the innocent.
    Berger K
    Med Law; 2010 Mar; 29(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 22457993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The assessment of expert testimony relevance and admissibility in medical malpractice cases in the Czech Republic. Can American judicial practice help us?
    Zakharov S
    Med Law; 2011 Mar; 30(1):147-63. PubMed ID: 21528803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. False confessions, expert testimony, and admissibility.
    Watson C; Weiss KJ; Pouncey C
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(2):174-86. PubMed ID: 20542936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inconsistency in evidentiary standards for medical testimony: disorder in the courts.
    Kassirer JP; Cecil JS
    JAMA; 2002 Sep; 288(11):1382-7. PubMed ID: 12234232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rape trauma syndrome as scientific expert testimony.
    Block AP
    Arch Sex Behav; 1990 Aug; 19(4):309-23. PubMed ID: 2205169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Admissibility of scientific evidence.
    Jerrold L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):270-1. PubMed ID: 25636562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The admissibility of behavioral science evidence in the courtroom: the translation of legal to scientific concepts and back.
    Faust D; Grimm PW; Ahern DC; Sokolik M
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2010; 6():49-77. PubMed ID: 17716029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Admissibility of neuropsychological testimony after Daubert and Kumho.
    Stern BH
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 11568467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.