355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23044389)
1. Concurrent evaluation of composite internal adaptation and bond strength in a class-I cavity.
Bakhsh TA; Sadr A; Shimada Y; Mandurah MM; Hariri I; Alsayed EZ; Tagami J; Sumi Y
J Dent; 2013 Jan; 41(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 23044389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of cyclic loading on marginal adaptation and bond strength in direct vs. indirect class II MO composite restorations.
Aggarwal V; Logani A; Jain V; Shah N
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 18833866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of flowable resin on bond strength and gap formation in Class I restorations.
Miguez PA; Pereira PN; Foxton RM; Walter R; Nunes MF; Swift EJ
Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):839-45. PubMed ID: 15451239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of cavity size and incremental technique on micro-tensile bond strength of resin composite in Class I cavities.
He Z; Shimada Y; Tagami J
Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 16725190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of filling technique and curing mode on the bond strengths of composite cores to pulpal floor dentin.
Ariyoshi M; Nikaido T; Foxton RM; Tagami J
Dent Mater J; 2010 Oct; 29(5):562-9. PubMed ID: 20733260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of cavity size and filling method on the bonding to Class I cavities.
He Z; Shimada Y; Sadr A; Ikeda M; Tagami J
J Adhes Dent; 2008 Dec; 10(6):447-53. PubMed ID: 19189675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of bond strength and internal adaptation between the dental cavity and adhesives applied in one and two layers.
Soares CG; Carracho HG; Braun AP; Borges GA; Hirakata LM; Spohr AM
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 20166413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of curing mode and moisture on nanoindentation mechanical properties and bonding of a self-adhesive resin cement to pulp chamber floor.
Moosavi H; Hariri I; Sadr A; Thitthaweerat S; Tagami J
Dent Mater; 2013 Jun; 29(6):708-17. PubMed ID: 23608759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of conventional and heavy flowable composites in class II restorations.
Rocha Gomes Torres C; Rêgo HM; Perote LC; Santos LF; Kamozaki MB; Gutierrez NC; Di Nicoló R; Borges AB
J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):793-9. PubMed ID: 24769385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interfacial Adaptation of Composite Restorations Before and After Light Curing: Effects of Adhesive and Filling Technique.
Yoshimine N; Shimada Y; Tagami J; Sadr A
J Adhes Dent; 2015 Aug; 17(4):329-36. PubMed ID: 26258175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microleakage of Class II restorations and microtensile bond strength to dentin of low-shrinkage composites.
Juloski J; Carrabba M; Aragoneses JM; Forner L; Vichi A; Ferrari M
Am J Dent; 2013 Oct; 26(5):271-7. PubMed ID: 24479279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of filling techniques and a low-viscosity composite liner on bond strength to class II cavities.
Figueiredo Reis A; Giannini M; Ambrosano GM; Chan DC
J Dent; 2003 Jan; 31(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 12615021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fractography of interface after microtensile bond strength test using swept-source optical coherence tomography.
Dao Luong MN; Shimada Y; Turkistani A; Tagami J; Sumi Y; Sadr A
Dent Mater; 2016 Jul; 32(7):862-9. PubMed ID: 27080369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of c-factor and layering technique on microtensile bond strength to dentin.
Nikolaenko SA; Lohbauer U; Roggendorf M; Petschelt A; Dasch W; Frankenberger R
Dent Mater; 2004 Jul; 20(6):579-85. PubMed ID: 15134946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of elastic cavity wall and occlusal loading on microleakage and dentin bond strength.
Pongprueksa P; Kuphasuk W; Senawongse P
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):466-75. PubMed ID: 17910223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in Class-V-cavities.
Li Q; Jepsen S; Albers HK; Eberhard J
Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 16084584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
