These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23044389)

  • 21. The influence of different placement techniques on the microtensile bond strength of low-shrink silorane composite bonded to Class I cavities.
    Almeida e Silva JS; Rolla JN; Baratieri LN; Monteiro S
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(6):e233-7. PubMed ID: 22313929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of Bond Strength, Marginal Integrity, and Fracture Strength of Bulk- vs Incrementally-filled Restorations.
    de Assis FS; Lima SN; Tonetto MR; Bhandi SH; Pinto SC; Malaquias P; Loguercio AD; Bandéca MC
    J Adhes Dent; 2016; 18(4):317-23. PubMed ID: 27419244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of different adhesion strategies on bond strength of resin composite to composite-dentin complex.
    Özcan M; Pekkan G
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 22812912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative in vivo and in vitro investigation of interfacial bond variability.
    Hannig M; Friedrichs C
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11203774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of cyclic loading on the microtensile bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
    Toledano M; Osorio R; Albaladejo A; Aguilera FS; Tay FR; Ferrari M
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 16536190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of current adhesives in class I cavity: Nondestructive imaging using optical coherence tomography and microtensile bond strength.
    Makishi P; Thitthaweerat S; Sadr A; Shimada Y; Martins AL; Tagami J; Giannini M
    Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):e190-200. PubMed ID: 26183294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Marginal and internal adaptation of extended class I restorations lined with flowable composites.
    Haak R; Wicht MJ; Noack MJ
    J Dent; 2003 May; 31(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 12735916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of airborne-particle abrasion on mechanical properties and bond strength of carbon/epoxy and glass/bis-GMA fiber-reinforced resin posts.
    Soares CJ; Santana FR; Pereira JC; Araujo TS; Menezes MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 18514666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Marginal adaptation of indirect restorations using different resin coating protocols.
    Medina AD; de Paula AB; de Fucio SB; Puppin-Rontani RM; Correr-Sobrinho L; Sinhoreti MA
    Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(6):672-8. PubMed ID: 23338259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of filler content on the microtensile bond strength of composite resin and dentin in Class I cavities.
    Han B; Dong Y; Gao X; Wang X; Tian F
    Quintessence Int; 2012 Feb; 43(2):e16-22. PubMed ID: 22257879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of pre-heated composites and flowable liners on Class II gingival margin gap formation.
    Sabatini C; Blunck U; Denehy G; Munoz C
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):663-71. PubMed ID: 21180006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of Bulk-filling on the Bonding Efficacy in Occlusal Class I Cavities.
    Van Ende A; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Van Meerbeek B
    J Adhes Dent; 2016; 18(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 27042703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of light-emitting diode (LED) curing modes on resin/dentin bond strength.
    Fahmy N; Naguib H; Guindy JE
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Dec; 18(8):670-5. PubMed ID: 19682222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of surface preparation on bond strength of resin luting cements to dentin.
    Peerzada F; Yiu CK; Hiraishi N; Tay FR; King NM
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):624-33. PubMed ID: 21180001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Gap measurement and bond strength of five selected adhesive systems bonded to tooth structure.
    Arbabzadeh F; Gage JP; Young WG; Shahabi S; Swenson SM
    Aust Dent J; 1998 Jun; 43(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 9707782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Acoustic emission analysis of tooth-composite interfacial debonding.
    Cho NY; Ferracane JL; Lee IB
    J Dent Res; 2013 Jan; 92(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 23100273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of bulk-fill systems: microtensile bond strength and non-destructive imaging of marginal adaptation.
    Fronza BM; Makishi P; Sadr A; Shimada Y; Sumi Y; Tagami J; Giannini M
    Braz Oral Res; 2018 Aug; 32():e80. PubMed ID: 30088553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.