These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23044539)

  • 1. Gene set analysis for self-contained tests: complex null and specific alternative hypotheses.
    Rahmatallah Y; Emmert-Streib F; Glazko G
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Dec; 28(23):3073-80. PubMed ID: 23044539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. GSAR: Bioconductor package for Gene Set analysis in R.
    Rahmatallah Y; Zybailov B; Emmert-Streib F; Glazko G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):61. PubMed ID: 28118818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unite and conquer: univariate and multivariate approaches for finding differentially expressed gene sets.
    Glazko GV; Emmert-Streib F
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Sep; 25(18):2348-54. PubMed ID: 19574285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative evaluation of gene set analysis approaches for RNA-Seq data.
    Rahmatallah Y; Emmert-Streib F; Glazko G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Dec; 15(1):397. PubMed ID: 25475910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new gene selection procedure based on the covariance distance.
    Hu R; Qiu X; Glazko G
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 26(3):348-54. PubMed ID: 19996162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The null hypothesis of GSEA, and a novel statistical model for competitive gene set analysis.
    Debrabant B
    Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 33(9):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 28453686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gene Sets Net Correlations Analysis (GSNCA): a multivariate differential coexpression test for gene sets.
    Rahmatallah Y; Emmert-Streib F; Glazko G
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Feb; 30(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 24292935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unraveling the molecular relevance of brain phenotypes: A comparative analysis of null models and test statistics.
    Cao Z; Zhan G; Qin J; Cupertino RB; Ottino-Gonzalez J; Murphy A; Pancholi D; Hahn S; Yuan D; Callas P; Mackey S; Garavan H
    Neuroimage; 2024 Jun; 293():120622. PubMed ID: 38648869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extracting the Strongest Signals from Omics Data: Differentially Expressed Pathways and Beyond.
    Glazko G; Rahmatallah Y; Zybailov B; Emmert-Streib F
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1613():125-159. PubMed ID: 28849561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical methods for gene set co-expression analysis.
    Choi Y; Kendziorski C
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Nov; 25(21):2780-6. PubMed ID: 19689953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
    Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An exact test for comparing a fixed quantitative property between gene sets.
    Parks MM
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Mar; 34(6):971-977. PubMed ID: 29088314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-linear tests for identifying differentially expressed genes or genetic networks.
    Xiong H
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Apr; 22(8):919-23. PubMed ID: 16473873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A global × global test for testing associations between two large sets of variables.
    Chaturvedi N; de Menezes RX; Goeman JJ
    Biom J; 2017 Jan; 59(1):145-158. PubMed ID: 27225065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. FWER and FDR control when testing multiple mediators.
    Sampson JN; Boca SM; Moore SC; Heller R
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 34(14):2418-2424. PubMed ID: 29420693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modelling p-value distributions to improve theme-driven survival analysis of cancer transcriptome datasets.
    Czwan E; Brors B; Kipling D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jan; 11():19. PubMed ID: 20064243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic pathway modeling: feasibility analysis and optimal experimental design.
    Maiwald T; Kreutz C; Pfeifer AC; Bohl S; Klingmüller U; Timmer J
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2007 Dec; 1115():212-20. PubMed ID: 18033750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential regulation enrichment analysis via the integration of transcriptional regulatory network and gene expression data.
    Ma S; Jiang T; Jiang R
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 31(4):563-71. PubMed ID: 25322838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonparametric relevance-shifted multiple testing procedures for the analysis of high-dimensional multivariate data with small sample sizes.
    Frömke C; Hothorn LA; Kropf S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 9():54. PubMed ID: 18221560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unsupervised gene set testing based on random matrix theory.
    Frost HR; Amos CI
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):442. PubMed ID: 27809777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.