These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23044556)

  • 1. Comparison of breast tissue measurements using magnetic resonance imaging, digital mammography and a mathematical algorithm.
    Lu LJ; Nishino TK; Johnson RF; Nayeem F; Brunder DG; Ju H; Leonard MH; Grady JJ; Khamapirad T
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6903-27. PubMed ID: 23044556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computing mammographic density from a multiple regression model constructed with image-acquisition parameters from a full-field digital mammographic unit.
    Lu LJ; Nishino TK; Khamapirad T; Grady JJ; Leonard MH; Brunder DG
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4905-21. PubMed ID: 17671343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images.
    Wei J; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Paquerault S; Chenevert T; Goodsitt MM
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):933-42. PubMed ID: 15125012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation.
    Keller BM; Nathan DL; Wang Y; Zheng Y; Gee JC; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4903-17. PubMed ID: 22894417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms: a validation study.
    Gubern-Mérida A; Kallenberg M; Platel B; Mann RM; Martí R; Karssemeijer N
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85952. PubMed ID: 24465808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dedicated breast CT: fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population.
    Vedantham S; Shi L; Karellas A; O'Connell AM
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7317-28. PubMed ID: 23231281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Volumetric breast density characteristics as determined from digital mammograms.
    Alonzo-Proulx O; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(22):7443-57. PubMed ID: 23093428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Introduction of an automated user-independent quantitative volumetric magnetic resonance imaging breast density measurement system using the Dixon sequence: comparison with mammographic breast density assessment.
    Wengert GJ; Helbich TH; Vogl WD; Baltzer P; Langs G; Weber M; Bogner W; Gruber S; Trattnig S; Pinker K
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 25333307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical comparison of a novel breast DXA technique to mammographic density.
    Shepherd JA; Herve L; Landau J; Fan B; Kerlikowske K; Cummings SR
    Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1490-8. PubMed ID: 16752583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Similarity of fibroglandular breast tissue content measured from magnetic resonance and mammographic images and by a mathematical algorithm.
    Nayeem F; Ju H; Brunder DG; Nagamani M; Anderson KE; Khamapirad T; Lu LJ
    Int J Breast Cancer; 2014; 2014():961679. PubMed ID: 25132995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast MRI and X-ray mammography registration using gradient values.
    García E; Diez Y; Diaz O; Lladó X; Gubern-Mérida A; Martí R; Martí J; Oliver A
    Med Image Anal; 2019 May; 54():76-87. PubMed ID: 30836308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms.
    van Engeland S; Snoeren PR; Huisman H; Boetes C; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Mar; 25(3):273-82. PubMed ID: 16524084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fatty and fibroglandular tissue volumes in the breasts of women 20-83 years old: comparison of X-ray mammography and computer-assisted MR imaging.
    Lee NA; Rusinek H; Weinreb J; Chandra R; Toth H; Singer C; Newstead G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):501-6. PubMed ID: 9016235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast density measurements with ultrasound tomography: a comparison with film and digital mammography.
    Duric N; Boyd N; Littrup P; Sak M; Myc L; Li C; West E; Minkin S; Martin L; Yaffe M; Schmidt S; Faiz M; Shen J; Melnichouk O; Li Q; Albrecht T
    Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):013501. PubMed ID: 23298122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated Breast Density Computation in Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Influence on Mean Glandular Dose and BIRADS Density Categorization.
    Castillo-García M; Chevalier M; Garayoa J; Rodriguez-Ruiz A; García-Pinto D; Valverde J
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):802-810. PubMed ID: 28214227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic resonance imaging for secondary assessment of breast density in a high-risk cohort.
    Klifa C; Carballido-Gamio J; Wilmes L; Laprie A; Shepherd J; Gibbs J; Fan B; Noworolski S; Hylton N
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan; 28(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 19631485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
    Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative Volumetric K-Means Cluster Segmentation of Fibroglandular Tissue and Skin in Breast MRI.
    Niukkanen A; Arponen O; Nykänen A; Masarwah A; Sutela A; Liimatainen T; Vanninen R; Sudah M
    J Digit Imaging; 2018 Aug; 31(4):425-434. PubMed ID: 29047034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative analysis of breast parenchymal patterns using 3D fibroglandular tissues segmented based on MRI.
    Nie K; Chang D; Chen JH; Hsu CC; Nalcioglu O; Su MY
    Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):217-26. PubMed ID: 20175484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.