These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23045142)

  • 1. Toxicity testing in chemical safety evaluation.
    Bus JS
    Curr Protoc Toxicol; 2007 Feb; Chapter 19():Unit19.2. PubMed ID: 23045142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of the dog as non-rodent test species in the safety testing schedule associated with the registration of crop and plant protection products (pesticides): present status.
    Box RJ; Spielmann H
    Arch Toxicol; 2005 Nov; 79(11):615-26. PubMed ID: 15940470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ending the use of animals in toxicity testing and risk evaluation.
    Rowan AN
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2015 Oct; 24(4):448-58. PubMed ID: 26364779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Overview of neurotoxicology.
    Tilson HA
    Curr Protoc Toxicol; 2001 May; Chapter 11():Unit11.1. PubMed ID: 20957638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of the TTC approach: learning from inclusion of pesticide active substances in the supporting database.
    Feigenbaum A; Pinalli R; Giannetto M; Barlow S
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2015 Jan; 75():24-38. PubMed ID: 25455897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rethinking guideline toxicity testing.
    Saghir SA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Jul; 72(2):423-8. PubMed ID: 25980640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of an in vitro test battery for assessing chemical effects on bovine germ cells under the ReProTect umbrella.
    Lazzari G; Tessaro I; Crotti G; Galli C; Hoffmann S; Bremer S; Pellizzer C
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2008 Dec; 233(3):360-70. PubMed ID: 18835402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SEURAT: Safety Evaluation Ultimately Replacing Animal Testing--recommendations for future research in the field of predictive toxicology.
    Daston G; Knight DJ; Schwarz M; Gocht T; Thomas RS; Mahony C; Whelan M
    Arch Toxicol; 2015 Jan; 89(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 25433540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Toxicogenomics in hazard assessment of chemicals].
    Kostka G; Liszewska M; Urbanek-Olejnik K
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2010; 61(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 20839457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tiered toxicity testing: evaluation of toxicity-based decision triggers for human health hazard characterization.
    Becker RA; Plunkett LM; Borzelleca JF; Kaplan AM
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2007 Dec; 45(12):2454-69. PubMed ID: 17689851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Similarities between the discovery and regulation of pharmaceuticals and pesticides: in support of a better understanding of the risks and benefits of each.
    Swanton CJ; Mashhadi HR; Solomon KR; Afifi MM; Duke SO
    Pest Manag Sci; 2011 Jul; 67(7):790-7. PubMed ID: 21520394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Introduction: Human metabolites in safety testing (MIST) issue.
    Guengerich FP
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2009 Feb; 22(2):237-8. PubMed ID: 19216576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Policy reforms to update chemical safety testing.
    Nel AE; Malloy TF
    Science; 2017 Mar; 355(6329):1016-1018. PubMed ID: 28280165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A discussion of the impact of US chemical regulation legislation on the field of toxicity testing.
    Sullivan K; Beck N; Sandusky C; Willett C
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Sep; 25(6):1231-6. PubMed ID: 21624455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rethink how chemical hazards are tested.
    Warner JC; Ludwig JK
    Nature; 2016 Aug; 536(7616):269-70. PubMed ID: 27535519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human pesticide testing gets qualified OK.
    Renner R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 May; 38(10):175A-176A. PubMed ID: 15212239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FIFRA Subdivision F testing Guidelines: are these tests adequate to detect potential hormonal activity for crop protection chemicals? Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
    Stevens JT; Tobia A; Lamb JC; Tellone C; O'Neal F
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1997 Apr; 50(5):415-31. PubMed ID: 9140462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A retrospective analysis of the added value of 1-year dog studies in pesticide human health risk assessments.
    Linke B; Mohr S; Ramsingh D; Bhuller Y
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2017 Aug; 47(7):581-591. PubMed ID: 28322593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chemical mixtures: greater-than-additive effects?
    LeBlanc GA; Wang G
    Environ Health Perspect; 2006 Sep; 114(9):A517-8; author reply A518-9. PubMed ID: 16966072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.