These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2304517)

  • 1. Editorial peer review.
    N Engl J Med; 1990 Mar; 322(9):638-9. PubMed ID: 2304517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reducing the costs of peer review.
    Nat Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 11(4):375. PubMed ID: 18368038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Editorial peer review in US medical journals.
    Weller AC
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1344-7. PubMed ID: 2406471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review under the microscope: an editor's view.
    Chan DL
    J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2011 Oct; 21(5):453-7. PubMed ID: 22316192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Our editorial process--some experiences and reflections.
    Emmelin M; Wall S
    Scand J Public Health; 2003; 31(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 12850969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Editorial review and the American Journal of Gastroenterology.
    Zetterman RK
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1996 Dec; 91(12):2459-60. PubMed ID: 8946966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Harefuah peer review].
    Shemer Y; Shoenfeld Y
    Harefuah; 2001 May; 140(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 11419062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Submitting a manuscript to the ASRT.
    Frosch JR
    Radiol Technol; 2012; 83(3):291-2. PubMed ID: 22267696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review: part of the writing process.
    Carlson K
    J Post Anesth Nurs; 1990 Feb; 5(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 2355342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Information for peer reviewers.
    Huston P
    CMAJ; 1994 Apr; 150(8):1211-22. PubMed ID: 8162544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer review in early career: just say yes!
    Roy-Byrne PP
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1602-3. PubMed ID: 20031104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review by early career psychiatrists: an opportunity for development.
    Gross AF; Wiechers IR; Stern TA
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1600-1. PubMed ID: 20031102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Support for peer review.
    Nat Immunol; 2010 Dec; 11(12):1063. PubMed ID: 21079625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review perspective for early career psychiatrists.
    Gelenberg AJ
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1599. PubMed ID: 20031101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review--the newcomers' perspective.
    Mainguy G; Motamedi MR; Mietchen D
    PLoS Biol; 2005 Sep; 3(9):e326. PubMed ID: 16149851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peering into the review process.
    Nat Struct Biol; 2000 Dec; 7(12):1075-6. PubMed ID: 11101879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimenting with peer review.
    Jabri E
    ACS Chem Biol; 2006 Jul; 1(6):325-6. PubMed ID: 17163762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What can CCR do for you?
    Potash J; Anderson KC
    Clin Cancer Res; 2010 Aug; 16(16):4069-70. PubMed ID: 20682715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Journal peer review.
    N Engl J Med; 1985 Aug; 313(7):455-6. PubMed ID: 4022077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.