These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23045205)

  • 1. Methods to convert continuous outcomes into odds ratios of treatment response and numbers needed to treat: meta-epidemiological study.
    da Costa BR; Rutjes AW; Johnston BC; Reichenbach S; Nüesch E; Tonia T; Gemperli A; Guyatt GH; Jüni P
    Int J Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 41(5):1445-59. PubMed ID: 23045205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Odds ratios of treatment response were well approximated from continuous rating scale scores for meta-analysis.
    Meister R; von Wolff A; Kriston L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 68(7):740-51. PubMed ID: 25801601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meta-analysis, Simpson's paradox, and the number needed to treat.
    Altman DG; Deeks JJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2002; 2():3. PubMed ID: 11860606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochrane Review: Osmotic and stimulant laxatives for the management of childhood constipation (Review).
    Gordon M; Naidoo K; Akobeng AK; Thomas AG
    Evid Based Child Health; 2013 Jan; 8(1):57-109. PubMed ID: 23878124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Number needed to treat (NNT) in clinical literature: an appraisal.
    Mendes D; Alves C; Batel-Marques F
    BMC Med; 2017 Jun; 15(1):112. PubMed ID: 28571585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to obtain NNT from Cohen's d: comparison of two methods.
    Furukawa TA; Leucht S
    PLoS One; 2011 Apr; 6(4):e19070. PubMed ID: 21556361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity subgroup analysis based on single-center vs. multi-center trial status when interpreting meta-analyses pooled estimates: the logical way forward.
    Alexander PE; Bonner AJ; Agarwal A; Li SA; Hariharan A; Izhar Z; Bhatnagar N; Alba C; Akl EA; Fei Y; Guyatt GH; Beyene J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():80-92. PubMed ID: 26597972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anticonvulsant drugs for migraine prophylaxis.
    Chronicle E; Mulleners W
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (3):CD003226. PubMed ID: 15266476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relative indices of treatment effect may be constant across different definitions of response in schizophrenia trials.
    Furukawa TA; Akechi T; Wagenpfeil S; Leucht S
    Schizophr Res; 2011 Mar; 126(1-3):212-9. PubMed ID: 21062670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) treatment for obstructive sleep apnea, road traffic accidents and driving simulator performance: a meta-analysis.
    Antonopoulos CN; Sergentanis TN; Daskalopoulou SS; Petridou ET
    Sleep Med Rev; 2011 Oct; 15(5):301-10. PubMed ID: 21195643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Drugs for preventing migraine headaches in children.
    Victor S; Ryan SW
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (4):CD002761. PubMed ID: 14583952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combining follow-up and change data is valid in meta-analyses of continuous outcomes: a meta-epidemiological study.
    da Costa BR; Nüesch E; Rutjes AW; Johnston BC; Reichenbach S; Trelle S; Guyatt GH; Jüni P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8):847-55. PubMed ID: 23747228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic review of outpatient services for chronic pain control.
    McQuay HJ; Moore RA; Eccleston C; Morley S; Williams AC
    Health Technol Assess; 1997; 1(6):i-iv, 1-135. PubMed ID: 9483161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Observer bias in randomised clinical trials with binary outcomes: systematic review of trials with both blinded and non-blinded outcome assessors.
    Hróbjartsson A; Thomsen AS; Emanuelsson F; Tendal B; Hilden J; Boutron I; Ravaud P; Brorson S
    BMJ; 2012 Feb; 344():e1119. PubMed ID: 22371859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of numbers needed to treat derived from systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Caveats and pitfalls.
    Ebrahim S
    Eval Health Prof; 2001 Jun; 24(2):152-64. PubMed ID: 11523384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Osmotic and stimulant laxatives for the management of childhood constipation.
    Gordon M; Naidoo K; Akobeng AK; Thomas AG
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Jul; (7):CD009118. PubMed ID: 22786523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tricyclic drugs for depression in children and adolescents.
    Hazell P; O'Connell D; Heathcote D; Henry D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (3):CD002317. PubMed ID: 10908557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deviation from intention to treat analysis in randomised trials and treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study.
    Abraha I; Cherubini A; Cozzolino F; De Florio R; Luchetta ML; Rimland JM; Folletti I; Marchesi M; Germani A; Orso M; Eusebi P; Montedori A
    BMJ; 2015 May; 350():h2445. PubMed ID: 26016488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.