These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23045362)

  • 1. Non-linear 3D evaluation of different oral implant-abutment connections.
    Streckbein P; Streckbein RG; Wilbrand JF; Malik CY; Schaaf H; Howaldt HP; Flach M
    J Dent Res; 2012 Dec; 91(12):1184-9. PubMed ID: 23045362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of different abutment connection designs on the stress distribution around five different implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Balik A; Karatas MO; Keskin H
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Sep; 38 Spec No():491-6. PubMed ID: 21574838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influences of implant neck design and implant-abutment joint type on peri-implant bone stress and abutment micromovement: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Yamanishi Y; Yamaguchi S; Imazato S; Nakano T; Yatani H
    Dent Mater; 2012 Nov; 28(11):1126-33. PubMed ID: 22920538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stress analysis in platform-switching implants: a 3-dimensional finite element study.
    Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Júnior JF; de Carvalho PS; de Moraes SL; Noritomi PY
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 20932121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching: different mismatch sizes, connection types, and implant protocols.
    Pessoa RS; Bezerra FJ; Sousa RM; Vander Sloten J; Casati MZ; Jaecques SV
    J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):1161-71. PubMed ID: 24635544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analyzing the effects of the platform-switching procedure on stresses in the bone and implant-abutment complex by 3-dimensional fem analysis.
    Cimen H; Yengin E
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Feb; 38(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 20662671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
    Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimization of the Conical Angle Design in Conical Implant-Abutment Connections: A Pilot Study Based on the Finite Element Method.
    Yao KT; Chen CS; Cheng CK; Fang HW; Huang CH; Kao HC; Hsu ML
    J Oral Implantol; 2018 Feb; 44(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 29090979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical evaluation of internal and external hexagon platform switched implant-abutment connections: An in vitro laboratory and three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Freitas-Júnior AC; Rocha EP; Bonfante EA; Almeida EO; Anchieta RB; Martini AP; Assunção WG; Silva NR; Coelho PG
    Dent Mater; 2012 Oct; 28(10):e218-28. PubMed ID: 22682782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stress distribution on scalloped implants with different microthread and connection configurations using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Choi KS; Park SH; Lee JH; Jeon YC; Yun MJ; Jeong CM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):e29-38. PubMed ID: 22616069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of lubricant on screw preload and stresses in a finite element model for a dental implant.
    Jörn D; Kohorst P; Besdo S; Rücker M; Stiesch M; Borchers L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):340-8. PubMed ID: 24529658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stress and strain patterns of 1-piece and 2-piece implant systems in bone: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ormianer Z; Ben Amar A; Duda M; Marku-Cohen S; Lewinstein I
    Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 22223190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants.
    Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical analysis on platform switching: is there any biomechanical rationale?
    Maeda Y; Miura J; Taki I; Sogo M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):581-4. PubMed ID: 17608737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of implant design on the stress distribution in a three-unit implant-supported distal cantilever fixed partial denture: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
    Koka P; Mohapatra A; Anandapandian PA; Murugesan K; Vasanthakumar M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 22945697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
    Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
    Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.