181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23045833)
1. Results of a control quality strategy in cervical cytology.
Gullo CE; Dami AL; Barbosa AP; Marques AM; Palmejani MA; de Lima LG; Bonilha JL
Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2012; 10(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 23045833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of liquid-based Pap tests: comparison of concurrent liquid-based tests and cervical biopsies on 782 women with previously abnormal Pap smears.
Guo M; Hu L; Martin L; Liu S; Baliga M; Hughson MD
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15839615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Natural history of false-negative papanicolaou smears: a prospective study using screening colposcopy in addition to cytology.
Mannino JR
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1998 Oct; 98(10):542-6. PubMed ID: 9821735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity of high-risk HPV Hybrid Capture II (hrHPV HC2) test using SurePath(TM) specimens in the prediction of cervical high-grade squamous lesions.
Zhou F; Pulinthanathu R; Elgert P; Cangiarella J; Simsir A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 May; 43(5):381-7. PubMed ID: 25546355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality metrics in cervical cytopathology: A single institutional study.
Senthil Kumar D; Ravikumar G
Cytopathology; 2022 Mar; 33(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 34854153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Positive predictive value of liquid-based and conventional cervical Papanicolaou smears reported as malignant.
Uyar DS; Eltabbakh GH; Mount SL
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 May; 89(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 12713984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Qualifying the cytologic diagnosis of "atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance" affects the predictive value of a squamous intraepithelial lesion on subsequent biopsy.
Genest DR; Dean B; Lee KR; Sheets E; Crum CP; Cibas ES
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Apr; 122(4):338-41. PubMed ID: 9648902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The significance of the Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Nasser SM; Cibas ES; Crum CP; Faquin WC
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 14579293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.
Arbyn M; Buntinx F; Van Ranst M; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch P; Dillner J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(4):280-93. PubMed ID: 14970277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing cytology, colposcopy and human papillomavirus cervical intraepithelial lesion screening methods in women with systemic lupus erythematosus.
García-Carrasco M; Mendoza-Pinto C; Méndez-Martínez S; Rodríguez-Reyes A; Munguía-Realpozo P; Taboada-Cole A; Vallejo-Ruiz V; Etchegaray-Morales I; Jiménez-Herrera R; Juárez-Melchor D; Villanueva-López I
Lupus; 2020 Aug; 29(9):1060-1066. PubMed ID: 32501171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reflex high-risk human papilloma virus DNA test is useful in the triage of women with atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Wu HH; Allen SL; Kirkpatrick JL; Elsheikh TM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Oct; 34(10):707-10. PubMed ID: 16955480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality control in cervicovaginal cytology by cytohistological correlation.
Izadi-Mood N; Sarmadi S; Sanii S
Cytopathology; 2013 Feb; 24(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 21929578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the reliability of repeat cervical smears and colposcopy in patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
Mayeaux EJ; Harper MB; Abreo F; Pope JB; Phillips GS
J Fam Pract; 1995 Jan; 40(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 7807039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utility of p16 Immunohistochemistry in Evaluating Negative Cervical Biopsies Following High-risk Pap Test Results.
Shain AF; Kwok S; Folkins AK; Kong CS
Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Jan; 42(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 29112019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix.
Heatley MK; Bury JP
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 9577735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the SurePath liquid-based Papanicolaou smear with the conventional Papanicolaou smear in a multisite direct-to-vial study.
Fremont-Smith M; Marino J; Griffin B; Spencer L; Bolick D
Cancer; 2004 Oct; 102(5):269-79. PubMed ID: 15386329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Managing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Papanicolaou smears.
Morin C; Bairati I; Bouchard C; Fortier M; Roy M; Moore L; Meisels A
J Reprod Med; 2001 Sep; 46(9):799-805. PubMed ID: 11584480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of Aptima and Cobas HPV testing platforms in detecting high-grade cervical dysplasia and cancer.
Ge Y; Christensen P; Luna E; Armylagos D; Schwartz MR; Mody DR
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Aug; 125(8):652-657. PubMed ID: 28574670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of Pap test in combination with ThinPrep cytological test in screening for cervical cancer.
Chen H; Shu HM; Chang ZL; Wang ZF; Yao HH; Zhu HM; Lu TM; Ma QY; Yang BL
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(4):1651-5. PubMed ID: 22799383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
