259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23047261)
41. Mutation of OPA1 gene causes deafness by affecting function of auditory nerve terminals.
Huang T; Santarelli R; Starr A
Brain Res; 2009 Dec; 1300():97-104. PubMed ID: 19733158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Prospective electrophysiologic findings of round window stimulation in a model of experimentally induced stapes fixation.
Lupo JE; Koka K; Holland NJ; Jenkins HA; Tollin DJ
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Dec; 30(8):1215-24. PubMed ID: 19779388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Intracochlear electrocochleography during cochlear implantation.
Calloway NH; Fitzpatrick DC; Campbell AP; Iseli C; Pulver S; Buchman CA; Adunka OF
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Sep; 35(8):1451-7. PubMed ID: 24892369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Electrophysiological markers of cochlear function correlate with hearing-in-noise performance among audiometrically normal subjects.
Grant KJ; Mepani AM; Wu P; Hancock KE; de Gruttola V; Liberman MC; Maison SF
J Neurophysiol; 2020 Aug; 124(2):418-431. PubMed ID: 32639924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded Directly Through the Cochlear Implant in Cochlear Implant Recipients: a Feasibility Study.
Attias J; HabibAllah S; Aditya Tarigoppula VS; Glick H; Chen C; Kanthaiah K; Litvak L
Ear Hear; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 43(5):1426-1436. PubMed ID: 35245922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Using a concha electrode to measure response patterns based on the amplitudes of cochlear microphonic waveforms across acoustic frequencies in normal-hearing subjects.
Zhang M
Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 25083598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing.
Scheperle RA; Tejani VD; Omtvedt JK; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Oleson JJ; Ozanne MV
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():45-57. PubMed ID: 28432874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Tuning curves of the difference tone auditory nerve neurophonic.
Henry KR
Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 99(1-2):160-7. PubMed ID: 8970824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Delayed low frequency hearing loss caused by cochlear implantation interventions via the round window but not cochleostomy.
Rowe D; Chambers S; Hampson A; Eastwood H; Campbell L; O'Leary S
Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():49-57. PubMed ID: 26739790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Correlation of early auditory potentials and intracochlear electrode insertion properties: an animal model featuring near real-time monitoring.
Campbell AP; Suberman TA; Buchman CA; Fitzpatrick DC; Adunka OF
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Dec; 31(9):1391-8. PubMed ID: 20856155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.
Telmesani LM; Said NM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Response Changes During Insertion of a Cochlear Implant Using Extracochlear Electrocochleography.
Giardina CK; Khan TE; Pulver SH; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Brown KD; Pillsbury HC; Fitzpatrick DC
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1146-1156. PubMed ID: 29554036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Psychoacoustic and electrophysiological electric-acoustic interaction effects in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
Imsiecke M; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 386():107873. PubMed ID: 31884220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Characteristics of the Summating Potential Measured Across a Cochlear Implant Array as an Indicator of Cochlear Function.
Panario J; Bester C; O'Leary SJ
Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1088-1106. PubMed ID: 36935398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Cochlear implantation in patients with auditory neuropathy of varied etiologies.
Mason JC; De Michele A; Stevens C; Ruth RA; Hashisaki GT
Laryngoscope; 2003 Jan; 113(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 12514381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Cochlear Implantation with the CI512 and CI532 Precurved Electrode Arrays: One-Year Speech Recognition and Intraoperative Thresholds of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.
Videhult Pierre P; Eklöf M; Smeds H; Asp F
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(6):299-308. PubMed ID: 31846976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The group delay and suppression pattern of the cochlear microphonic potential recorded at the round window.
He W; Porsov E; Kemp D; Nuttall AL; Ren T
PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e34356. PubMed ID: 22470560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Postoperative Intracochlear Electrocochleography in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Association to Audiometric Thresholds and Auditory Performance.
Attias J; Ulanovski D; Hilly O; Greenstein T; Sokolov M; HabibAllah S; Mormer H; Raveh E
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1135-1143. PubMed ID: 31977726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Correlation of the latency shift and brain stem potentials in basocochlear hearing loss and the time course of the click stimulus-induced evoked wave in the cochlea].
Janssen T; Steinhoff HJ; Böhnke F
Laryngorhinootologie; 1989 Jul; 68(7):379-82. PubMed ID: 2765050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
