259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23047261)
61. The potential use of low-frequency tones to locate regions of outer hair cell loss.
Kamerer AM; Diaz FJ; Peppi M; Chertoff ME
Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 342():39-47. PubMed ID: 27677389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Compound action potential and cochlear microphonic extracted from electrocochleographic responses to condensation or rarefaction clicks.
Arslan E; Santarelli R; Sparacino G; Sella G
Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Mar; 120(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 11603770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Auditory neuropathy in systemic sclerosis: a speech perception and evoked potential study before and after cochlear implantation.
Santarelli R; Scimemi P; Dal Monte E; Genovese E; Arslan E
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Sep; 263(9):809-15. PubMed ID: 16763823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception.
Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U
Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Electrocochleography During Translabyrinthine Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma Removal.
Riggs WJ; Fitzpatrick DC; Mattingly JK; Harris MS; Hiss MM; Rajkumar S; Zhan KY; Brown KD; Moberly AC; Dodson EE; Adunka OF
Otol Neurotol; 2020 Mar; 41(3):e369-e377. PubMed ID: 31923083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Evoked cochlear potentials in the barn owl.
Köppl C; Gleich O
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2007 Jun; 193(6):601-12. PubMed ID: 17318655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. [Use of intraoperative round window electrocochleography for assessment of cochlear implantation safety].
Wang L; Cao K; Wang Z
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Sep; 20(18):822-4. PubMed ID: 17144488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Intracochlear recordings of electrophysiological parameters indicating cochlear damage.
Adunka OF; Mlot S; Suberman TA; Campbell AP; Surowitz J; Buchman CA; Fitzpatrick DC
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Oct; 31(8):1233-41. PubMed ID: 20818290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Modulation at the guinea pig round window of summating potentials and compound action potentials by low-frequency sound.
Klis JF; Smoorenburg GF
Hear Res; 1985; 20(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 4077742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Residual Cochlear Function in Adults and Children Receiving Cochlear Implants: Correlations With Speech Perception Outcomes.
Fontenot TE; Giardina CK; Dillon M; Rooth MA; Teagle HF; Park LR; Brown KD; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Pillsbury HC; Fitzpatrick DC
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):577-591. PubMed ID: 30169463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Evidence that inner hair cells are the major source of cochlear summating potentials.
Zheng XY; Ding DL; McFadden SL; Henderson D
Hear Res; 1997 Nov; 113(1-2):76-88. PubMed ID: 9387987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Hair cell and neural contributions to the cochlear summating potential.
Pappa AK; Hutson KA; Scott WC; Wilson JD; Fox KE; Masood MM; Giardina CK; Pulver SH; Grana GD; Askew C; Fitzpatrick DC
J Neurophysiol; 2019 Jun; 121(6):2163-2180. PubMed ID: 30943095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Predicting Postoperative Speech Perception and Audiometric Thresholds Using Intracochlear Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Panario J; Bester C; O'Leary S
Ear Hear; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38816899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Cochlear implantation and hearing preservation: Results in 21 consecutively operated patients using the round window approach.
Erixon E; Köbler S; Rask-Andersen H
Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 132(9):923-31. PubMed ID: 22667762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Electrophysiologic consequences of flexible electrode insertions in gerbils with noise-induced hearing loss.
Choudhury B; Adunka OF; Awan O; Pike JM; Buchman CA; Fitzpatrick DC
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Mar; 35(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 23988997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. The development and interpretation of the summating potential response.
Harvey D; Steel KP
Hear Res; 1992 Aug; 61(1-2):137-46. PubMed ID: 1526886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Auditory nerve neurophonic produced by the frequency difference of two simultaneously presented tones.
Henry KR
Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 99(1-2):151-9. PubMed ID: 8970823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. An analytic approach to identifying the sources of the low-frequency round window cochlear response.
Kamerer AM; Chertoff ME
Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 375():53-65. PubMed ID: 30808536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Channel interaction in cochlear implant users evaluated using the electrically evoked compound action potential.
Abbas PJ; Hughes ML; Brown CJ; Miller CA; South H
Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(4):203-13. PubMed ID: 15205548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Cochlear electrical activity in the C57BL/6 laboratory mouse: volume-conducted vertex and round window responses.
Henry KR; Chole RA
Acta Otolaryngol; 1979; 87(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 760378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
