These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23047719)

  • 1. Factors that influence automated perimetry.
    Fingeret M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):7018. PubMed ID: 23047719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors that influence standard automated perimetry test results in glaucoma: test reliability, technician experience, time of day, and season.
    Junoy Montolio FG; Wesselink C; Gordijn M; Jansonius NM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):7010-7. PubMed ID: 22952121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reclaiming the Periphery: Automated Kinetic Perimetry for Measuring Peripheral Visual Fields in Patients With Glaucoma.
    Mönter VM; Crabb DP; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Feb; 58(2):868-875. PubMed ID: 28159974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Current practice with standard automated perimetry.
    Bosworth CF; Sample PA; Johnson CA; Weinreb RN
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec; 15(4):172-81. PubMed ID: 17585432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated perimetry in glaucoma--room for improvement?
    O'Brien C; Wild JM
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1995 Mar; 79(3):200-1. PubMed ID: 7703193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Glaucoma is present prior to its detection with standard automated perimetry: is it time to change our concepts?
    Sample PA
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2003 Mar; 241(3):168-9. PubMed ID: 12722769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pointwise univariate linear regression of perimetric sensitivity against follow-up time in glaucoma.
    Cox TA
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Feb; 105(2):204-5. PubMed ID: 9479276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated combined kinetic and static perimetry: an alternative to standard perimetry in patients with neuro-ophthalmic disease and glaucoma.
    Pineles SL; Volpe NJ; Miller-Ellis E; Galetta SL; Sankar PS; Shindler KS; Maguire MG
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 124(3):363-9. PubMed ID: 16534056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the effectiveness of ophthalmic assistants as screeners for glaucoma in North India.
    Sinha SK; Astbury N
    Eye (Lond); 2011 Oct; 25(10):1310-6. PubMed ID: 21720416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated perimetry. How do we interpret the results?
    Wilensky JT
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1989 Feb; 107(2):185-6. PubMed ID: 2916969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency doubling perimetry.
    Sponsel WE; Trigo Y; Hendricks J; Lloyd C
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jul; 126(1):155-6. PubMed ID: 9683173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selecting visual field tests and assessing visual field deterioration in glaucoma.
    Nouri-Mahdavi K
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 49(6):497-505. PubMed ID: 25433738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A review of current technology used in evaluating visual function in glaucoma.
    Turalba AV; Grosskreutz C
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2010; 25(5-6):309-16. PubMed ID: 21091017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility of the subjective determination of glaucomatous visual field progression.
    Tanna AP; Bandi JR; Budenz DL; Feuer WJ; Feldman RM; Herndon LW; Rhee DJ; Whiteside-de Vos J
    Ophthalmology; 2011 Jan; 118(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 20723992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
    Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How long will automated perimetry remain standard practice?
    Gutteridge IF
    Clin Exp Optom; 2005 Mar; 88(2):71-2. PubMed ID: 15807637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of eye testing order on automated perimetry results using the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm standard 24-2.
    Barkana Y; Gerber Y; Mora R; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Jun; 124(6):781-4. PubMed ID: 16769830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The art of perimetry.
    Harrington DO
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1975 Sep; 80(3 Pt 1):414-6. PubMed ID: 1163590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Flicker defined form perimetry in glaucoma suspects with normal achromatic visual fields.
    Reznicek L; Lamparter J; Vogel M; Kampik A; Hirneiß C
    Curr Eye Res; 2015 Jul; 40(7):683-9. PubMed ID: 25207744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
    Sample PA; Medeiros FA; Racette L; Pascual JP; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3381-9. PubMed ID: 16877406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.