These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23047917)

  • 1. Object-guided spatial selection in touch without concurrent changes in the perceived location of the hands.
    Gillmeister H; Cantarella S; Gheorghiu AI; Adler J
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 23047917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Object-guided spatial attention in touch: holding the same object with both hands delays attentional selection.
    Gillmeister H; Adler J; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 May; 22(5):931-42. PubMed ID: 19413480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Common mechanisms of spatial attention in memory and perception: a tactile dual-task study.
    Katus T; Andersen SK; Müller MM
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Mar; 24(3):707-18. PubMed ID: 23172773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Common anatomical and external coding for hands and feet in tactile attention: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Heed T; Röder B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jan; 22(1):184-202. PubMed ID: 19199399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Which finger? Early effects of attentional selection within the hand are absent when the hand is viewed.
    Gillmeister H; Sambo CF; Forster B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 May; 31(10):1874-81. PubMed ID: 20584192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anterior and posterior attentional control systems use different spatial reference frames: ERP evidence from covert tactile-spatial orienting.
    Eimer M; Forster B; Van Velzen J
    Psychophysiology; 2003 Nov; 40(6):924-33. PubMed ID: 14986845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Top-down influences mediate hand bias in spatial attention.
    Garza JP; Strom MJ; Wright CE; Roberts RJ; Reed CL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):819-23. PubMed ID: 23722884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual context and practice change the distribution of attention in touch.
    Roberts RD; Humphreys GW
    Brain Res; 2010 Sep; 1351():185-197. PubMed ID: 20599819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial tuning of tactile attention modulates visual processing within hemifields: an ERP investigation of crossmodal attention.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):402-10. PubMed ID: 16034566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual object separation resolves competitive interactions in somatosensory cortex evoked signals during concurrent vibrotactile stimulation of the left and right hand.
    Pang CY; Müller MM
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Apr; 125():154-162. PubMed ID: 28322985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of hand posture on preparatory control processes and sensory modulations in tactile-spatial attention.
    Eimer M; Forster B; Fieger A; Harbich S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):596-608. PubMed ID: 15036056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual capture of apparent limb position influences tactile temporal order judgments.
    Gallace A; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Apr; 379(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 15814201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hands behind your back: effects of arm posture on tactile attention in the space behind the body.
    Gillmeister H; Forster B
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Feb; 216(4):489-97. PubMed ID: 22101569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bare hands and attention: evidence for a tactile representation of the human body.
    Coslett HB; Lie E
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(14):1865-76. PubMed ID: 15381016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic and predictive links between touch and vision.
    Gray R; Tan HZ
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Jul; 145(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 12070744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-lasting capture of tactile attention by body shadows.
    Galfano G; Pavani F
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):518-27. PubMed ID: 16028029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Within-hemifield posture changes affect tactile-visual exogenous spatial cueing without spatial precision, especially in the dark.
    Kennett S; Driver J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1121-35. PubMed ID: 24470256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial coordinate systems for tactile spatial attention depend on developmental vision: evidence from event-related potentials in sighted and congenitally blind adult humans.
    Röder B; Föcker J; Hötting K; Spence C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 28(3):475-83. PubMed ID: 18702719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Covert attention in touch: behavioral and ERP evidence for costs and benefits.
    Forster B; Eimer M
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Mar; 42(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 15787854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.