These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2304817)

  • 1. Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: a comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies.
    Grainger J; Segui J
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Feb; 47(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 2304817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: the neighborhood frequency effect.
    Grainger J; O'Regan JK; Jacobs AM; Segui J
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Mar; 45(3):189-95. PubMed ID: 2710616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of masked repetition priming and orthographic neighborhood in visual recognition of words.
    Perea M; Gotor A
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Aug; 83(1):179-86. PubMed ID: 8873189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neighborhood frequency effects and letter visibility in visual word recognition.
    Grainger J; O'Regan JK; Jacobs AM; Segui J
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Jan; 51(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 1549424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shared neighborhood effects in masked orthographic priming.
    van Heuven WJ; Dijkstra T; Grainger J; Schriefers H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Mar; 8(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 11340872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: effects of relative prime-target frequency.
    Segui J; Grainger J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Feb; 16(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 2137524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition.
    Becker CA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 May; 5(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 528937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blocking by word frequency and neighborhood density in visual word recognition: a task-specific response criteria account.
    Perea M; Carreiras M; Grainger J
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Oct; 32(7):1090-102. PubMed ID: 15813492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Masked repetition and phonological priming within and across modalities.
    Grainger J; Diependaele K; Spinelli E; Ferrand L; Farioli F
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1256-69. PubMed ID: 14622059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repetition, semantic priming, and stimulus quality: implications for the interactive-compensatory reading model.
    Durgunoglu AY
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Oct; 14(4):590-603. PubMed ID: 2972798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions.
    Herdman CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 May; 18(2):460-70. PubMed ID: 1593230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Masked inhibitory priming in english: evidence for lexical inhibition.
    Davis CJ; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):668-87. PubMed ID: 16822131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Masked partial-word priming in visual word recognition: effects of positional letter frequency.
    Grainger J; Jacobs AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Oct; 19(5):951-64. PubMed ID: 8228845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The word-superiority effect and phonological recoding.
    Krueger LE
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):685-94. PubMed ID: 1435271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ease of identifying words degraded by visual noise.
    Barber P; de la Mahotière C
    Br J Psychol; 1982 Aug; 73 (Pt 3)():371-81. PubMed ID: 7116083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Orthographic neighborhood and concreteness effects in the lexical decision task.
    Samson D; Pillon A
    Brain Lang; 2004 Nov; 91(2):252-64. PubMed ID: 15485714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Category size effects revisited: frequency and masked priming effects in semantic categorization.
    Forster KI
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):276-86. PubMed ID: 15172545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The suffix priming effect: Further evidence for an early morpho-orthographic segmentation process independent of its semantic content.
    Lázaro M; Illera V; Sainz J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(1):197-208. PubMed ID: 25801451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Where are the effects of frequency in visual word recognition tasks? Right where we said they were! Comment on Monsell, Doyle, and Haggard (1989).
    Balota DA; Chumbley JI
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1990 Jun; 119(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 2141355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.