These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2305042)

  • 1. Mammography screening: technology, radiation dose and risk, quality control, and benefits to society. A symposium conducted during the scientific assembly and annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America. Chicago, December 1988. Proceedings.
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):627-56. PubMed ID: 2305042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors affecting increasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina from 1997 through 2001: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveys.
    Pisano ED; Chiu YF; Ni L; Li Y; Britt GG; Johnson RE; Burns B; Cole E; Kuzmiak C; Koomen M; Pavic D
    Acad Radiol; 2004 May; 11(5):536-43. PubMed ID: 15147618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Symposium 2: the problems and the future perspectives of the digital mammography].
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Dec; 69(12):1419-35. PubMed ID: 24366563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mammography at reduced doses: present performance and future possibilities.
    Muntz EP; Wilkinson E; George FW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1980 Apr; 134(4):741-7. PubMed ID: 6767360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Suggestions for standardisation of dose measurements and dose recording during mammography (author's transl)].
    Säbel M
    Rofo; 1981 Mar; 134(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 6452373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 72nd scientific assembly and annual meeting: the Radiological Society of North America. Chicago, November 30-December 5, 1986. Abstracts.
    Radiology; 1986 Nov; 161 Spec No():1-546. PubMed ID: 3763938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Quality control during mammography-II (author's transl)].
    Friedrich M
    Rofo; 1981 Mar; 134(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 6452372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 73rd scientific assembly and annual meeting: the Radiological Society of North America. November 29-December 4, 1987, Chicago. Abstracts.
    Radiology; 1987 Nov; 165 Suppl():1-556. PubMed ID: 3659397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammography in the 1990s: the United States and Canada.
    Suleiman OH; Spelic DC; McCrohan JL; Symonds GR; Houn F
    Radiology; 1999 Feb; 210(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 10207413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confrontation of mammography systems in flanders with the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in mammography screening. Analysis of initial results.
    Bosmans H; Carton AK; Deprez T; Rogge F; Van Steen A; Van Limbergen E; Marchal G
    JBR-BTR; 1999 Dec; 82(6):288-93. PubMed ID: 10670170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Present and future of analog image and digital image on mammography in closing the symposium].
    Kodera Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 May; 62(5):635-6. PubMed ID: 16767817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Film interpretation session: Radiological Society of North America. Sixty-fifth Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 1979. Summary of discussion and diagnoses.
    Radiology; 1979 Dec; 133(3 Pt 1):807-20. PubMed ID: 504677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of radiation risk from screening mammography: recent trends and comparison with expected benefits.
    Feig SA; Ehrlich SM
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):638-47. PubMed ID: 2305043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 74th scientific assembly and annual meeting: the Radiological Society of North America, including sessions in joint sponsorship with the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. November 27-December 2, 1988, Chicago. Abstracts.
    Radiology; 1988 Nov; 169 Suppl():1-601. PubMed ID: 3175018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
    Friedrich MA
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors affecting decreasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina after 2002: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveys.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Chung Y; Britt GG; Burns B; Cole E
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):685-91. PubMed ID: 17502258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiological Society of North America 88th Annual Meeting. December 1-6, 2002. Chicago, Illinois, USA. Abstracts.
    Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225 Suppl():291-670. PubMed ID: 12418464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Quality control of mammography].
    Endo T
    Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():324-7. PubMed ID: 17682173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Assessment of mammographic units in Poland in the view of current requirements of radiation protection regulations].
    Bekas M; Pachocki KA; Rózycki Z; Wieprzowski K; Fabiszewska E
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2006; 57(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 16900867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Legislative and regulatory mandates for mammography quality assurance.
    Fintor L; Alciati MH; Fischer R
    J Public Health Policy; 1995; 16(1):81-107. PubMed ID: 7738160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.