These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2305060)

  • 1. Display of CT studies on a two-screen electronic workstation versus a film panel alternator: sensitivity and efficiency among radiologists.
    Foley WD; Jacobson DR; Taylor AJ; Goodman LR; Stewart ET; Gurney JW; Stroka D
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):769-73. PubMed ID: 2305060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interpretation of CT studies: single-screen workstation versus film alternator.
    Beard DV; Hemminger BM; Perry JR; Mauro MA; Muller KE; Warshauer DM; Smith MA; Zito AJ
    Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):565-9. PubMed ID: 8475309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpretation time of serial chest CT examinations with stacked-metaphor workstation versus film alternator.
    Beard DV; Molina PL; Muller KE; Denelsbeck KM; Hemminger BM; Perry JR; Braeuning MP; Glueck DH; Bidgood WD; Mauro M
    Radiology; 1995 Dec; 197(3):753-8. PubMed ID: 7480751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How many screens does a CT workstation need?
    Beard DV; Hemminger BM; Denelsbeck KM; Johnston RE
    J Digit Imaging; 1994 May; 7(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 8075186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Workstation scheme and implementation for a medical imaging information system.
    Tao Y; Miao J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 May; 116(5):654-7. PubMed ID: 12875671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MR examination of the knee: interpretation with multiscreen digital workstation vs hardcopy format.
    Brown JJ; Malchow SC; Totty WG; Wilson AJ; Lee JK; Vannier MW; Jost RG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Jul; 157(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 2048543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computed tomography interpretations with a low-cost workstation: a timing study.
    Beard DV; Hemminger BM; Pisano ED; Denelsbeck KM; Warshauer DM; Mauro MA; Keefe B; McCartney WH; Wilcox CB
    J Digit Imaging; 1994 Aug; 7(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 7948172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiologists' productivity in the interpretation of CT scans: a comparison of PACS with conventional film.
    Reiner BI; Siegel EL; Hooper FJ; Pomerantz S; Dahlke A; Rallis D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):861-4. PubMed ID: 11264065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of interpretation of CT scans: comparing PACS monitor displays and hard-copy images.
    Reiner BI; Siegel EL; Hooper FJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1407-10. PubMed ID: 12438025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Primary CT diagnosis of abdominal masses in a PACS environment.
    Straub WH; Gur D; Good WF; Campbell WL; Davis PL; Hecht ST; Skolnick ML; Thaete FL; Rosenthal MS; Sashin D
    Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):739-43. PubMed ID: 1994411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of 12-bit and 8-bit gray scale resolution in MR imaging of the CNS. An ROC analysis.
    Smith HJ; Bakke SJ; Smevik B; Hald JK; Moen G; Rudenhed B; Abildgaard A
    Acta Radiol; 1992 Nov; 33(6):505-11. PubMed ID: 1449870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PACS monitors: an evolution of radiologist's viewing techniques.
    Bennett WF; Vaswani KK; Mendiola JA; Spigos DG
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():171-4. PubMed ID: 12105721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of CRT workstation on observer's performance.
    Itoh Y; Ishigaki T; Sakuma S; Hirose M; Fukatsu H; Itoh S; Horikawa Y; Shimamoto K; Tadokoro T; Ikeda M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1992 May; 37(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 1395526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of film-based versus filmless operation on the productivity of CT technologists.
    Reiner BI; Siegel EL; Hooper FJ; Glasser D
    Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):481-5. PubMed ID: 9577498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Viewport: an object-oriented approach to integrate workstation software for tile and stack mode display.
    Ghosh S; Andriole KP; Avrin DE
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 Aug; 10(3 Suppl 1):177-9. PubMed ID: 9268874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Java-based remote viewing and processing of nuclear medicine images: toward "the imaging department without walls".
    Slomka PJ; Elliott E; Driedger AA
    J Nucl Med; 2000 Jan; 41(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 10647613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new approach to RIS/DR interconnection.
    Hayes B
    Radiol Manage; 1999; 21(2):44-7. PubMed ID: 10351742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Picture archiving and communication system--Part one: Filmless radiology and distance radiology.
    De Backer AI; Mortelé KJ; De Keulenaer BL
    JBR-BTR; 2004; 87(5):234-41. PubMed ID: 15587562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interpretation accuracy of a CCD film digitizer.
    Gitlin JN; Scott WW; Bell K; Narayan A
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 12105698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The new Siemens MagicView medical workstation for CT and MRI images].
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1994 Jul; 4(4):207. PubMed ID: 7918711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.