These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2305061)

  • 1. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images.
    Slasky BS; Gur D; Good WF; Costa-Greco MA; Harris KM; Cooperstein LA; Rockette HE
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):775-80. PubMed ID: 2305061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image compression and chest radiograph interpretation: image perception comparison between uncompressed chest radiographs and chest radiographs stored using 10:1 JPEG compression.
    Beall DP; Shelton PD; Kinsey TV; Horton MC; Fortman BJ; Achenbach S; Smirnoff V; Courneya DL; Carpenter B; Gironda JT
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):33-8. PubMed ID: 10847358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performance.
    Thaete FL; Fuhrman CR; Oliver JH; Britton CA; Campbell WL; Feist JH; Straub WH; Davis PL; Plunkett MB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):575-81. PubMed ID: 8109499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Receiver-operating-characteristic study of chest radiographs in children: digital hard-copy film vs 2K x 2K soft-copy images.
    Razavi M; Sayre JW; Taira RK; Simons M; Huang HK; Chuang KS; Rahbar G; Kangarloo H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):443-8. PubMed ID: 1729805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of 2048-line digital display formats and conventional radiographs: an ROC study.
    Hayrapetian A; Aberle DR; Huang HK; Fiske R; Morioka C; Valentino D; Boechat MI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 May; 152(5):1113-8. PubMed ID: 2705346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography.
    Elam EA; Rehm K; Hillman BJ; Maloney K; Fajardo LL; McNeill K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 1738985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of luminance and resolution on observer performance with chest radiographs.
    Herron JM; Bender TM; Campbell WL; Sumkin JH; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):169-74. PubMed ID: 10751483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of image processing on chest radiograph interpretations in a PACS environment.
    Rosenthal MS; Good WF; Costa-Greco MA; Miketic LM; Eeelkema EA; Gur D; Rockette HE
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Aug; 25(8):897-901. PubMed ID: 2394572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Primary CT diagnosis of abdominal masses in a PACS environment.
    Straub WH; Gur D; Good WF; Campbell WL; Davis PL; Hecht ST; Skolnick ML; Thaete FL; Rosenthal MS; Sashin D
    Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):739-43. PubMed ID: 1994411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An ROC study of chest radiographs: 2K Versus 4K high-resolution soft-copy images.
    Kim SY; Hwang YJ; Han YH; Seo JW; Lee JY; Kim YH; Cha SJ; Hur G; Lee SS
    J Digit Imaging; 2007 Dec; 20(4):347-51. PubMed ID: 17191100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of irreversible image compression on diagnostic accuracy in thoracic imaging.
    Aberle DR; Gleeson F; Sayre JW; Brown K; Batra P; Young DA; Stewart BK; Ho BK; Huang HK
    Invest Radiol; 1993 May; 28(5):398-403. PubMed ID: 8496031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Chest radiography: comparison of high-resolution digital displays with conventional and digital film.
    Cox GG; Cook LT; McMillan JH; Rosenthal SJ; Dwyer SJ
    Radiology; 1990 Sep; 176(3):771-6. PubMed ID: 2389035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of subtle abnormalities on chest radiographs after irreversible compression.
    Savcenko V; Erickson BJ; Palisson PM; Persons KR; Manduca A; Hartman TE; Harms GF; Brown LR
    Radiology; 1998 Mar; 206(3):609-16. PubMed ID: 9494474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of interstitial lung abnormalities on picture archive and communication system video monitors.
    Washowich TL; Williams SC; Richardson LA; Simmons GE; Dao NV; Allen TW; Hammet GC; Morris MJ
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 Feb; 10(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 9147526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison of LCD and CRT monitors for detection of pulmonary nodules and interstitial lung diseases on digital chest radiographs by using receiver operating characteristic analysis].
    Ikeda R; Katsuragawa S; Shimonobou T; Hiai Y; Hashida M; Awai K; Yamashita Y; Doi K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 May; 62(5):734-41. PubMed ID: 16733502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does knowledge of the clinical history affect the accuracy of chest radiograph interpretation?
    Good BC; Cooperstein LA; DeMarino GB; Miketic LM; Gennari RC; Rockette HE; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Apr; 154(4):709-12. PubMed ID: 2107662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of digital radiography and conventional X-ray in the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodule with receiver operating characteristic analysis].
    Duan G; Chen WG; Wang JY; Huang XH; Wang Y; Lu W
    Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2003 Jun; 23(6):621-3. PubMed ID: 12810395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Urinary calculi on computed radiography: comparison of observer performance with hard-copy versus soft-copy images on different viewer systems.
    Kim AY; Cho KS; Song KS; Kim JH; Kim JG; Ha HK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Aug; 177(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 11461856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-aided diagnosis of pulmonary nodules: results of a large-scale observer test.
    MacMahon H; Engelmann R; Behlen FM; Hoffmann KR; Ishida T; Roe C; Metz CE; Doi K
    Radiology; 1999 Dec; 213(3):723-6. PubMed ID: 10580945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved pulmonary nodule detection with scanning equalization radiography.
    Wandtke JC; Plewes DB; McFaul JA
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3420264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.