These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23053234)

  • 1. Specificity, rank preference, and the colonization of a non-native host plant by the Melissa blue butterfly.
    Forister ML; Scholl CF; Jahner JP; Wilson JS; Fordyce JA; Gompert Z; Narala DR; Alex Buerkle C; Nice CC
    Oecologia; 2013 May; 172(1):177-88. PubMed ID: 23053234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Host range evolution is not driven by the optimization of larval performance: the case of Lycaeides melissa (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) and the colonization of alfalfa.
    Forister ML; Nice CC; Fordyce JA; Gompert Z
    Oecologia; 2009 Jun; 160(3):551-61. PubMed ID: 19271241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Many Dimensions of Diet Breadth: Phytochemical, Genetic, Behavioral, and Physiological Perspectives on the Interaction between a Native Herbivore and an Exotic Host.
    Harrison JG; Gompert Z; Fordyce JA; Buerkle CA; Grinstead R; Jahner JP; Mikel S; Nice CC; Santamaria A; Forister ML
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0147971. PubMed ID: 26836490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of an exotic host plant affects mate choice in an insect herbivore.
    Forister ML; Scholl CF
    Am Nat; 2012 Jun; 179(6):805-10. PubMed ID: 22617267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ant association facilitates the evolution of diet breadth in a lycaenid butterfly.
    Forister ML; Gompert Z; Nice CC; Forister GW; Fordyce JA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 May; 278(1711):1539-47. PubMed ID: 21047856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Escaping an evolutionary trap: preference and performance of a native insect on an exotic invasive host.
    Keeler MS; Chew FS
    Oecologia; 2008 Jun; 156(3):559-68. PubMed ID: 18327618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. VARIATION IN PREFERENCE AND SPECIFICITY IN MONOPHAGOUS AND OLIGOPHAGOUS SWALLOWTAIL BUTTERFLIES.
    Thompson JN
    Evolution; 1988 Jan; 42(1):118-128. PubMed ID: 28563838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The predictability of genomic changes underlying a recent host shift in Melissa blue butterflies.
    Chaturvedi S; Lucas LK; Nice CC; Fordyce JA; Forister ML; Gompert Z
    Mol Ecol; 2018 Jun; 27(12):2651-2666. PubMed ID: 29617046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reciprocal latitudinal clines in oviposition behavior ofPapilio glaucus andP. canadensis across the Great Lakes hybrid zone: possible sex-linkage of oviposition preferences.
    Scriber JM; Giebink BL; Snider D
    Oecologia; 1991 Sep; 87(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 28313263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting evolutionary predictability.
    Linnen CR
    Mol Ecol; 2018 Jun; 27(12):2647-2650. PubMed ID: 29894580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unravelling the role of host plant expansion in the diversification of a Neotropical butterfly genus.
    McClure M; Elias M
    BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Jun; 16(1):128. PubMed ID: 27306900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consequences of exotic host use: impacts on Lepidoptera and a test of the ecological trap hypothesis.
    Yoon S; Read Q
    Oecologia; 2016 Aug; 181(4):985-96. PubMed ID: 26820566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Colonizations cause diversification of host preferences: A mechanism explaining increased generalization at range boundaries expanding under climate change.
    Singer MC; Parmesan C
    Glob Chang Biol; 2021 Aug; 27(15):3505-3518. PubMed ID: 33896082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. PREFERENCE HIERARCHIES AND THE ORIGIN OF GEOGRAPHIC SPECIALIZATION IN HOST USE IN SWALLOWTAIL BUTTERFLIES.
    Thompson JN
    Evolution; 1993 Oct; 47(5):1585-1594. PubMed ID: 28564889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The evolution of novel host use is unlikely to be constrained by trade-offs or a lack of genetic variation.
    Gompert Z; Jahner JP; Scholl CF; Wilson JS; Lucas LK; Soria-Carrasco V; Fordyce JA; Nice CC; Buerkle CA; Forister ML
    Mol Ecol; 2015 Jun; 24(11):2777-93. PubMed ID: 25877787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modelling the impacts of two exotic invasive species on a native butterfly: top-down vs. bottom-up effects.
    Keeler MS; Chew FS; Goodale BC; Reed JM
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 May; 75(3):777-88. PubMed ID: 16689960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preference, performance, and chemical defense in an endangered butterfly using novel and ancestral host plants.
    Haan NL; Bowers MD; Bakker JD
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):992. PubMed ID: 33446768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chilades pandava mothers discriminate among Cycas species during oviposition choice tests, but only in an endemic naïve population.
    Marler TE; Lindström AJ; Marler PN
    Plant Signal Behav; 2016 Aug; 11(8):e1208879. PubMed ID: 27391307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decoupling of female host plant preference and offspring performance in relative specialist and generalist butterflies.
    Friberg M; Posledovich D; Wiklund C
    Oecologia; 2015 Aug; 178(4):1181-92. PubMed ID: 25783488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Covariance of preference and performance on normal and novel hosts in a locally monophagous and locally polyphagous butterfly population.
    Bossart JL
    Oecologia; 2003 May; 135(3):477-86. PubMed ID: 12721839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.