These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23053370)

  • 1. The transtympanic promontory stimulation test in patients with auditory deprivation: correlations with electrical dynamics of cochlear implant and speech perception.
    Alfelasi M; Piron JP; Mathiolon C; Lenel N; Mondain M; Uziel A; Venail F
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 May; 270(6):1809-15. PubMed ID: 23053370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory Performance and Electrical Stimulation Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Auditory Neuropathy Compared With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Attias J; Greenstein T; Peled M; Ulanovski D; Wohlgelernter J; Raveh E
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 28225734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
    Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Refractory recovery function of electrical auditory on the survival auditory nerve in cochlear implant recipients].
    Xi X; Ji F; Han DY; Huang DL; Hong MD; Yang WY
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Feb; 39(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 15195587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measures.
    Firszt JB; Chambers And RD; Kraus N
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):516-31. PubMed ID: 12476089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of hearing preservation on electrical thresholds and speech performances in cochlear implantation.
    D'Elia A; Bartoli R; Giagnotti F; Quaranta N
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):343-7. PubMed ID: 22388729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrode discrimination by early-deafened subjects using the cochlear limited multiple-electrode cochlear implant.
    Busby PA; Clark GM
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):291-304. PubMed ID: 10981605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct Elicitation of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials by Electrical Stimulation and Their Use to Verify the Most Comfortable Level of Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tavora-Vieira D; Ffoulkes E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(4):294-307. PubMed ID: 36958296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of residual hearing in traditional cochlear implant candidates after implantation with a conventional electrode.
    Cosetti MK; Friedmann DR; Zhu BZ; Heman-Ackah SE; Fang Y; Keller RG; Shapiro WH; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 23449440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of preoperative electrical stimulability and historical factors on performance with multichannel cochlear implant.
    Kileny PR; Zimmerman-Phillips S; Kemink JL; Schmaltz SP
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1991 Jul; 100(7):563-8. PubMed ID: 2064268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Complications and pitfalls of cochlear implantation in otosclerosis: a 6-year follow-up cohort study.
    Sainz M; Garcia-Valdecasas J; Ballesteros JM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Dec; 30(8):1044-8. PubMed ID: 19395988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
    Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Degree of modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation.
    Marrinan MS; Roland JT; Reitzen SD; Waltzman SB; Cohen LT; Cohen NL
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 May; 25(3):290-4. PubMed ID: 15129107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Cochlear Implant Performance Prognostic Test Based on Electrical Field Interactions Evaluated by eABR (Electrical Auditory Brainstem Responses).
    Guevara N; Hoen M; Truy E; Gallego S
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155008. PubMed ID: 27149268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.
    Telmesani LM; Said NM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audibility, speech perception and processing of temporal cues in ribbon synaptic disorders due to OTOF mutations.
    Santarelli R; del Castillo I; Cama E; Scimemi P; Starr A
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt B):200-12. PubMed ID: 26188103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The cochlear implant; basic principles.
    Brackmann DE
    Laryngoscope; 1976 Mar; 86(3):373-88. PubMed ID: 1256212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term asymmetric hearing affects cochlear implantation outcomes differently in adults with pre- and postlingual hearing loss.
    Boisvert I; McMahon CM; Dowell RC; Lyxell B
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129167. PubMed ID: 26043227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relative importance of monaural sound deprivation and bilateral significant hearing loss in predicting cochlear implantation outcomes.
    Boisvert I; McMahon CM; Tremblay G; Lyxell B
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):758-66. PubMed ID: 21750463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of round-window and transtympanic promontory electric stimulation in cochlear implant candidates.
    Kileny PR; Zwolan TA; Zimmerman-Phillips S; Kemink JL
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):294-9. PubMed ID: 1487088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.