These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23053708)

  • 1. The influence of ambient lighting on the detection of small contrast elements in digital dental radiographs.
    Schriewer T; Schulze R; Filippi A; Mischak I; Payer M; Dagassan-Berndt D; Kühl S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Sep; 17(7):1727-31. PubMed ID: 23053708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of ambient light level at the monitor surface on digital radiographic evaluation of approximal carious lesions: an in vitro study.
    Hellén-Halme K; Lith A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Mar; 41(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 22378753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of ambient light in the detection of contrast elements in digital dental radiography.
    Ohla H; Dagassan-Berndt D; Payer M; Filippi A; Schulze RKW; Kühl S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Nov; 126(5):439-443. PubMed ID: 30228056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ink-jet printout of radiographs on transparent film and glossy paper versus monitor display: an ROC analysis.
    Kühl S; Krummenauer F; Dagassan-Berndt D; Lambrecht TJ; d'Hoedt B; Schulze RK
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Jun; 15(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 20306098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of ambient light and monitor brightness and contrast settings on the detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs: an in vitro study.
    Hellén-Halme K; Petersson A; Warfvinge G; Nilsson M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Oct; 37(7):380-4. PubMed ID: 18812599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Grassl U; Schulze RK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic Accuracy of Caries and Periapical Lesions on a Monitor with and without DICOM-GSDF Calibration Under Different Ambient Light Conditions.
    Freire RT; Prata-Júnior AR; Pinho JNA; Takeshita WM
    J Digit Imaging; 2022 Jun; 35(3):654-659. PubMed ID: 35166971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs: effect of ambient light and automatic optimization of monitor luminance.
    Uffmann M; Prokop M; Kupper W; Mang T; Fiedler V; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Mar; 40(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 15714093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of display type and room illuminance in chest radiographs.
    Liukkonen E; Jartti A; Haapea M; Oikarinen H; Ahvenjärvi L; Mattila S; Nevala T; Palosaari K; Perhomaa M; Nieminen MT
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):3171-9. PubMed ID: 26662032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between DICOM-calibrated and uncalibrated consumer grade and 6-MP displays under different lighting conditions in panoramic radiography.
    Kallio-Pulkkinen S; Haapea M; Liukkonen E; Huumonen S; Tervonen O; Nieminen MT
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(5):20140365. PubMed ID: 25564888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital radiography in general dental practice: a field study.
    Hellén-Halme K; Nilsson M; Petersson A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):249-55. PubMed ID: 17586850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of room lighting on grey-scale perception with a CRT-and a TFT monitor display.
    Haak R; Wicht MJ; Hellmich M; Nowak G; Noack MJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 12058268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of ambient lighting in chest radiology reading rooms.
    Pollard BJ; Samei E; Chawla AS; Beam C; Heyneman LE; Koweek LM; Martinez-Jimenez S; Washington L; Hashimoto N; McAdams HP
    J Digit Imaging; 2012 Aug; 25(4):520-6. PubMed ID: 22349990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of varying displays and room illuminance on caries diagnostic accuracy in digital dental radiographs.
    Pakkala T; Kuusela L; Ekholm M; Wenzel A; Haiter-Neto F; Kortesniemi M
    Caries Res; 2012; 46(6):568-74. PubMed ID: 22947623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance in soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs.
    Goo JM; Choi JY; Im JG; Lee HJ; Chung MJ; Han D; Park SH; Kim JH; Nam SH
    Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):762-6. PubMed ID: 15273338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of two X-ray tube voltages on detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs. An in vitro study.
    Hellén-Halme K
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Apr; 15(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 20143243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of displayed image size on radiographic detection of approximal caries.
    Haak R; Wicht MJ; Nowak G; Hellmich M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 13679355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of monitors on approximal caries detection in digital radiographs--standard versus precalibrated DICOM part 14 displays: an in vitro study.
    Hellén-Halme K; Nilsson M; Petersson A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 May; 107(5):716-20. PubMed ID: 19201219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effect of ambient lighting on the diagnostic efficiency of display screen workplaces].
    Klein HM; Stargardt A; Grehl T; Glaser KH; Günther RW
    Rofo; 1994 Feb; 160(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 8312516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality aspects of digital radiography in general dental practice.
    Hellén-Halme K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2007; (184):9-60. PubMed ID: 17645148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.