These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23053709)

  • 1. Survival rate of approximal-ART restorations using a two-layer technique for glass ionomer insertion.
    Bonifácio CC; Hesse D; de Oliveira Rocha R; Bönecker M; Raggio DP; van Amerongen WE
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Sep; 17(7):1745-50. PubMed ID: 23053709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bilayer technique and nano-filled coating increase success of approximal ART restorations: a randomized clinical trial.
    Hesse D; Bonifácio CC; Guglielmi Cde A; Bönecker M; van Amerongen WE; Raggio DP
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2016 May; 26(3):231-9. PubMed ID: 26370224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Glass carbomer and compomer for ART restorations: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Olegário IC; Hesse D; Mendes FM; Bonifácio CC; Raggio DP
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1761-1770. PubMed ID: 30171345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of ART and conventional techniques on clinical performance of glass-ionomer cement restorations in load bearing areas of permanent and primary dentitions: A systematic review.
    Ruengrungsom C; Palamara JEA; Burrow MF
    J Dent; 2018 Nov; 78():1-21. PubMed ID: 30017937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does low-cost GIC have the same survival rate as high-viscosity GIC in atraumatic restorative treatments? A RCT.
    Moura MS; Sousa GP; Brito MHSF; Silva MCC; Lima MDM; Moura LFAD; Lima CCB
    Braz Oral Res; 2020; 33():e125. PubMed ID: 31994598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Survival Rate of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) Restorations Using a Glass Ionomer Bilayer Technique with a Nanofilled Coating: A Bi-center Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Hesse D; Bonifácio CC; Bönecker M; Guglielmi Cde A; da Franca C; van Amerongen WE; Colares V; Raggio DP
    Pediatr Dent; 2016; 38(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 26892210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A preliminary clinical trial using flowable glass-ionomer cement as a liner in proximal-ART restorations: the operator effect.
    Bonifácio CC; Hesse D; Bönecker M; Van Loveren C; Van Amerongen WE; Raggio DP
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2013 May; 18(3):e529-32. PubMed ID: 23524424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low-cost GICs reduce survival rate in occlusal ART restorations in primary molars after one year: A RCT.
    Olegário IC; Pacheco AL; de Araújo MP; Ladewig NM; Bonifácio CC; Imparato JC; Raggio DP
    J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():45-50. PubMed ID: 27956016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Restoration of permanent teeth in young rural children in Cambodia using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique and Fuji II glass ionomer cement.
    Mallow PK; Durward CS; Klaipo M
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 1998 Mar; 8(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9558544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation and comparison of silorane resin composite to glass ionomer in occluso-proximal restorations of primary molars: A randomized controlled trial.
    Maru VP; Kulkarni P; Chauhan R; Bapat SS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2022; 40(3):281-287. PubMed ID: 36260469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of GIC-brand on the survival rate of proximal-ART restorations.
    Bonifácio CC; Hesse D; Raggio DP; Bönecker M; van Loveren C; van Amerongen WE
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jul; 23(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 22891625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 2-year survival and cost analysis of occlusoproximal ART restorations using encapsulated glass ionomer cement in primary molars: a randomized controlled trial.
    Garbim JR; Saihara CS; Olegário IC; Hesse D; Araujo MP; Bonifácio CC; Braga MM; Raggio DP
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):647. PubMed ID: 38824540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flowable glass ionomer cement as a liner: improving marginal adaptation of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations.
    Bonifácio CC; van Amerongen WE; Meschini TG; Raggio DP; Bönecker M
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2010; 77(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 20359424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches.
    Mandari GJ; Frencken JE; van't Hof MA
    Caries Res; 2003; 37(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 12771499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study.
    Hübel S; Mejàre I
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Jan; 13(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12542617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Survival rate of primary molar restorations is not influenced by hand mixed or encapsulated GIC: 24 months RCT.
    Oliveira RC; Camargo LB; Novaes TF; Pontes LRA; Olegário IC; Gimenez T; Pássaro AL; Tedesco TK; Braga MM; Mendes FM; Raggio DP
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jul; 21(1):371. PubMed ID: 34301217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Giomer composite compared to glass ionomer in occlusoproximal ART restorations of primary molars: 24-month RCT.
    Pássaro AL; Olegário IC; Laux CM; Oliveira RC; Tedesco TK; Raggio DP
    Aust Dent J; 2022 Jun; 67(2):148-158. PubMed ID: 34904247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Partial caries removal and cariostatic materials in carious primary molar teeth: a randomised controlled clinical trial.
    Foley J; Evans D; Blackwell A
    Br Dent J; 2004 Dec; 197(11):697-701; discussion 689. PubMed ID: 15592552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A clinical evaluation of resin-based composite and glass ionomer cement restorations placed in primary teeth using the ART approach: results at 24 months.
    Ersin NK; Candan U; Aykut A; Onçağ O; Eronat C; Kose T
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Nov; 137(11):1529-36. PubMed ID: 17082278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. One year Survival Rate of Ketac Molar versus Vitro Molar for Occlusoproximal ART Restorations: a RCT.
    Anna Luisa de Brito P; Isabel Cristina O; Clarissa Calil B; Ana Flávia Bissoto C; José Carlos Pettorossi I; Daniela Prócida R
    Braz Oral Res; 2017 Nov; 31():e88. PubMed ID: 29116299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.