186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23054032)
1. Assessing the discriminative ability of risk models for more than two outcome categories.
Van Calster B; Vergouwe Y; Looman CW; Van Belle V; Timmerman D; Steyerberg EW
Eur J Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 27(10):761-70. PubMed ID: 23054032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Polytomous diagnosis of ovarian tumors as benign, borderline, primary invasive or metastatic: development and validation of standard and kernel-based risk prediction models.
Van Calster B; Valentin L; Van Holsbeke C; Testa AC; Bourne T; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Oct; 10():96. PubMed ID: 20961457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extending the c-statistic to nominal polytomous outcomes: the Polytomous Discrimination Index.
Van Calster B; Van Belle V; Vergouwe Y; Timmerman D; Van Huffel S; Steyerberg EW
Stat Med; 2012 Oct; 31(23):2610-26. PubMed ID: 22733650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simple dichotomous updating methods improved the validity of polytomous prediction models.
Van Hoorde K; Vergouwe Y; Timmerman D; Van Huffel S; Steyerberg EW; Van Calster B
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Oct; 66(10):1158-65. PubMed ID: 23849738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Polytomous logistic regression analysis could be applied more often in diagnostic research.
Biesheuvel CJ; Vergouwe Y; Steyerberg EW; Grobbee DE; Moons KG
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 18177785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing calibration of multinomial risk prediction models.
Van Hoorde K; Vergouwe Y; Timmerman D; Van Huffel S; Steyerberg EW; Van Calster B
Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(15):2585-96. PubMed ID: 24549725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discrimination ability of prediction models for ordinal outcomes: relationships between existing measures and a new measure.
Van Calster B; Van Belle V; Vergouwe Y; Steyerberg EW
Biom J; 2012 Sep; 54(5):674-85. PubMed ID: 22711459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computing the polytomous discrimination index.
Dover DC; Islam S; Westerhout CM; Moore LE; Kaul P; Savu A
Stat Med; 2021 Jul; 40(16):3667-3681. PubMed ID: 33866577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visualizing and assessing discrimination in the logistic regression model.
Royston P; Altman DG
Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2508-20. PubMed ID: 20641144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing discriminative ability of risk models in clustered data.
van Klaveren D; Steyerberg EW; Perel P; Vergouwe Y
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jan; 14():5. PubMed ID: 24423445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ROC curves for clinical prediction models part 1. ROC plots showed no added value above the AUC when evaluating the performance of clinical prediction models.
Verbakel JY; Steyerberg EW; Uno H; De Cock B; Wynants L; Collins GS; Van Calster B
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 126():207-216. PubMed ID: 32712176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Polytomous regression did not outperform dichotomous logistic regression in diagnosing serious bacterial infections in febrile children.
Roukema J; van Loenhout RB; Steyerberg EW; Moons KG; Bleeker SE; Moll HA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18177786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new concordance measure for risk prediction models in external validation settings.
van Klaveren D; Gönen M; Steyerberg EW; Vergouwe Y
Stat Med; 2016 Oct; 35(23):4136-52. PubMed ID: 27251001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using the dichotomous Rasch model to analyze polytomous items.
He Q; Wheadon C
J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 23442327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures.
Steyerberg EW; Vickers AJ; Cook NR; Gerds T; Gonen M; Obuchowski N; Pencina MJ; Kattan MW
Epidemiology; 2010 Jan; 21(1):128-38. PubMed ID: 20010215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nonparametric estimation and inference for polytomous discrimination index.
Li J; Feng Q; Fine JP; Pencina MJ; Van Calster B
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Oct; 27(10):3092-3103. PubMed ID: 28178877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A unified Bayesian semiparametric approach to assess discrimination ability in survival analysis.
Zhao L; Feng D; Chen G; Taylor JM
Biometrics; 2016 Jun; 72(2):554-62. PubMed ID: 26676324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of competing risks prediction models using polytomous discrimination index.
Ding M; Ning J; Li R
Can J Stat; 2021 Sep; 49(3):731-753. PubMed ID: 34707327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The polytomous discrimination index for prediction involving multistate processes under intermittent observation.
Jiang S; Cook RJ
Stat Med; 2022 Aug; 41(19):3661-3678. PubMed ID: 35596238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How variation in predictor measurement affects the discriminative ability and transportability of a prediction model.
Pajouheshnia R; van Smeden M; Peelen LM; Groenwold RHH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 105():136-141. PubMed ID: 30223065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
