185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23054032)
21. Multiple-choice tests: polytomous IRT models misestimate item information.
García-Pérez MA
Span J Psychol; 2014 Dec; 17():E88. PubMed ID: 26054359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Lung cancer risk prediction: Prostate, Lung, Colorectal And Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial models and validation.
Tammemagi CM; Pinsky PF; Caporaso NE; Kvale PA; Hocking WG; Church TR; Riley TL; Commins J; Oken MM; Berg CD; Prorok PC
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Jul; 103(13):1058-68. PubMed ID: 21606442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A discussion of calibration techniques for evaluating binary and categorical predictive models.
Fenlon C; O'Grady L; Doherty ML; Dunnion J
Prev Vet Med; 2018 Jan; 149():107-114. PubMed ID: 29290291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessing risk prediction models using individual participant data from multiple studies.
Pennells L; Kaptoge S; White IR; Thompson SG; Wood AM;
Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Mar; 179(5):621-32. PubMed ID: 24366051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessment of performance of survival prediction models for cancer prognosis.
Chen HC; Kodell RL; Cheng KF; Chen JJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Jul; 12():102. PubMed ID: 22824262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantifying discrimination of Framingham risk functions with different survival C statistics.
Pencina MJ; D'Agostino RB; Song L
Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1543-53. PubMed ID: 22344892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The c-index is not proper for the evaluation of $t$-year predicted risks.
Blanche P; Kattan MW; Gerds TA
Biostatistics; 2019 Apr; 20(2):347-357. PubMed ID: 29462286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prognostic models for identifying risk of poor outcome in people with acute ankle sprains: the SPRAINED development and external validation study.
Keene DJ; Schlüssel MM; Thompson J; Hagan DA; Williams MA; Byrne C; Goodacre S; Cooke M; Gwilym S; Hormbrey P; Bostock J; Haywood K; Wilson D; Collins GS; Lamb SE
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Nov; 22(64):1-112. PubMed ID: 30474592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An Empirical Q-Matrix Validation Method for the Polytomous G-DINA Model.
de la Torre J; Qiu XL; Santos KC
Psychometrika; 2022 Jun; 87(2):693-724. PubMed ID: 34843060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Vascular Study Group of New England Cardiac Risk Index (VSG-CRI) predicts cardiac complications more accurately than the Revised Cardiac Risk Index in vascular surgery patients.
Bertges DJ; Goodney PP; Zhao Y; Schanzer A; Nolan BW; Likosky DS; Eldrup-Jorgensen J; Cronenwett JL;
J Vasc Surg; 2010 Sep; 52(3):674-83, 683.e1-683.e3. PubMed ID: 20570467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessing the suitability of sets-based approaches: estimating the discriminative power of risk models for ordinal outcome treatments.
Chang CH; Lin LC; Chen IC; Yen CH
Int Health; 2017 Jan; 9(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 26409872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Multinomial Regression Approach to Model Outcome Heterogeneity.
Sun B; VanderWeele T; Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ
Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Nov; 186(9):1097-1103. PubMed ID: 28595286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prediction of an outcome using trajectories estimated from a linear mixed model.
Maruyama N; Takahashi F; Takeuchi M
J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):779-90. PubMed ID: 20183443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prioritized concordance index for hierarchical survival outcomes.
Cheung LC; Pan Q; Hyun N; Katki HA
Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(15):2868-2882. PubMed ID: 30957257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A Comparison of Imputation Strategies for Ordinal Missing Data on Likert Scale Variables.
Wu W; Jia F; Enders C
Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(5):484-503. PubMed ID: 26610248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. External validity of a mortality prediction model in patients after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using multi-level methodology.
Hadjianastassiou VG; Tekkis PP; Athanasiou T; Muktadir A; Young JD; Hands LJ
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2007 Nov; 34(5):514-21. PubMed ID: 17681832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Interpreting incremental value of markers added to risk prediction models.
Pencina MJ; D'Agostino RB; Pencina KM; Janssens AC; Greenland P
Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Sep; 176(6):473-81. PubMed ID: 22875755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Developing risk models for multicenter data using standard logistic regression produced suboptimal predictions: A simulation study.
Falconieri N; Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Wynants L
Biom J; 2020 Jul; 62(4):932-944. PubMed ID: 31957077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparison of the polytomous logistic regression and joint cox proportional hazards models for evaluating multiple disease subtypes in prospective cohort studies.
Xue X; Kim MY; Gaudet MM; Park Y; Heo M; Hollenbeck AR; Strickler HD; Gunter MJ
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2013 Feb; 22(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 23292084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The calibrated model-based concordance improved assessment of discriminative ability in patient clusters of limited sample size.
van Klaveren D; Steyerberg EW; Gönen M; Vergouwe Y
Diagn Progn Res; 2019; 3():11. PubMed ID: 31183411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
